Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31917272›Full record

ReviewBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2020

Cellular Immunotherapy for Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma in the Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Engineered T Cell Era: Still a Role for Allogeneic Transplantation?

Peter Dreger, Timothy S Fenske, Silvia Montoto, Marcelo C Pasquini, Anna Sureda, Mehdi Hamadani, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR)

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Selecting the Optimal CAR-T for the Treatment of B-Cell Malignancies.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Peter DregerDepartment Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: peter.dreger@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Timothy S FenskeDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Silvia MontotoDepartment of Haemato-oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Marcelo C PasquiniCIBMTR, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Anna SuredaHematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia-Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain.
Mehdi HamadaniCIBMTR, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR)
Medical College of Wisconsin · USHeidelberg University · DEInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T (CART) cells are a promising new treatment option for patients with multiply relapsed and refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Because of the favorable outcome data reported for CART cells, uncertainty is emerging if there is still a role for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in the treatment of R/R DLBCL. This article provides an overview of available evidence and theoretical considerations to put these 2 types of cellular immunotherapy (CI) into perspective. Altogether, current data suggest that CART cells are preferred now over transplantation as first-choice CI in many clinical situations. However, the majority of patients will fail CART therapy, resulting in an unmet medical need where allo-HCT could be beneficial. In contrast, employing allo-HCT instead of CART cells as first CI should be presently restricted to situations where CART cell therapy is deemed not feasible or useful, such as patients with refractory cytopenia or incipient myelodysplastic syndrome. However, allo-HCT remains a standard treatment option as first CI for patients with chemosensitive R/R DLBCL when CARTs are not available or transplantation is preferred by the patient. Continuous collection and analysis of CI outcome data by professional registries appear to be of key importance for developing rational strategies of CI allocation and sequencing.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseReceptors, Chimeric AntigenHumansImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesTransplantation, HomologousReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAllogeneic transplantationCART cellsDiffuse large B cell lymphomaReview

Identifiers

PMID31917272
PMCPMC7207150
OpenAlexW2997775719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.