Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31917259›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2019

Gclust: A Parallel Clustering Tool for Microbial Genomic Data.

Ruilin Li, Xiaoyu He, Chuangchuang Dai, Haidong Zhu, Xianyu Lang, Wei Chen, Xiaodong Li, Dan Zhao, Yu Zhang, Xinyin Han and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ruilin LiComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Xiaoyu HeComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Chuangchuang DaiComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Haidong ZhuComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Xianyu LangComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Wei ChenComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Xiaodong LiComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Dan ZhaoComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yu ZhangComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Xinyin HanComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Tie NiuComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yi ZhaoComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Rongqiang CaoComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Rong HeComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Zhonghua LuComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Xuebin ChiComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; Center of Scientific Computing Applications & Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Weizhong LiJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: wli@jcvi.org.
Beifang NiuComputer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; Guizhou University School of Medicine, Guiyang 550025, China. Electronic address: niubf@cnic.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accelerating growth of the public microbial genomic data imposes substantial burden on the research community that uses such resources. Building databases for non-redundant reference sequences from massive microbial genomic data based on clustering analysis is essential. However, existing clustering algorithms perform poorly on long genomic sequences. In this article, we present Gclust, a parallel program for clustering complete or draft genomic sequences, where clustering is accelerated with a novel parallelization strategy and a fast sequence comparison algorithm using sparse suffix arrays (SSAs). Moreover, genome identity measures between two sequences are calculated based on their maximal exact matches (MEMs). In this paper, we demonstrate the high speed and clustering quality of Gclust by examining four genome sequence datasets. Gclust is freely available for non-commercial use at https://github.com/niu-lab/gclust. We also introduce a web server for clustering user-uploaded genomes at http://niulab.scgrid.cn/gclust.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomeUser-Computer InterfaceArchaeaBacteriaCluster AnalysisDatabases, FactualFungiGenomicsVirusesMaximal exact matchMicrobial genome clusteringParallelizationSegment extensionSparse suffix array

Identifiers

PMID31917259
PMCPMC7056916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.