ArticleeLife2020
Open exploration.
Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Misreporting of Patient-Relevant and Study Design Elements in Anesthesiology Randomized Controlled Trials: An Observational Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- On "Confirmatory" Methodological Research in Statistics and Related Fields.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Combined LC-MS/MS feature grouping, statistical prioritization, and interactive networking in msFeaST.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- On the scope of scientific hypotheses.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- A dual-task approach to inform the taxonomy of inhibition-related processes.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2023Article
- Mediating effect of pubertal stages on the family environment and neurodevelopment: An open-data replication and multiverse analysis of an ABCD StudyNeuroimage. Reports · 2022Article
- Neural heterogeneity underlying late adolescent motivational processing is linked to individual differences in behavioral sensation seeking.Journal of neuroscience research · 2022Article
- Identifying the neural dynamics of category decisions with computational model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- Interactions between methodological and interindividual variability: How Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task contrast maps vary and impact associations with behavior.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Network topology of symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arguments in support of open science tend to focus on confirmatory research practices. Here we argue that exploratory research should also be encouraged within the framework of open science. We lay out the benefits of 'open exploration' and propose two complementary ways to implement this with little infrastructural change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.