Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916903›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

Factors affecting the vaccination choices of pregnant women for their children: a systematic review of the literature.

Annalisa Rosso, Azzurra Massimi, Erica Pitini, Angelo Nardi, Valentina Baccolini, Carolina Marzuillo, Corrado De Vito, Paolo Villari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perceived feasibility of a multicomponent prenatal intervention on childhood vaccinations: Findings from a national cross-sectional survey of prenatal care providers, April-June 2022.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annalisa RossoDeparment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0537-5130
Azzurra MassimiDeparment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6612-2949
Erica PitiniDeparment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2018-3679
Angelo NardiDeparment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy.
Valentina BaccoliniDeparment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7873-7817
Carolina MarzuilloDeparment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7299-5727
Corrado De VitoDeparment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7846-672X
Paolo VillariDeparment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3139-0668
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, an increase in vaccine hesitancy has led to a decrease in vaccination coverage in several countries. We conducted a systematic review of studies that assessed knowledge of and attitudes toward pediatric vaccinations, and the vaccination choices and their determinants among pregnant women. A total of 6,277 records were retrieved, and 16 full texts were included in the narrative synthesis. The published literature on the topic shows that, overall, pregnant women believe that vaccines are important for the protection of their children and the community, but various concerns and misunderstandings persist around vaccine safety and efficacy, which reduce the trust of expectant mothers in immunization. Nevertheless, such attitudes and choices vary depending on the vaccine being considered and the corresponding determinants should therefore be studied in the context of each specific vaccination. Further research on this topic is needed, particularly in non-western countries.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleVaccinesChildFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyVaccinationVaccinesattitudesimmunizationknowledgePregnancyvaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID31916903
PMCPMC7482832
OpenAlexW2999913433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.