Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916832›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2020

Does conflict resolution rely on working memory?

Melissa E Moss, Atsushi Kikumoto, Ulrich Mayr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Does an external distractor interfere with the triggering of item-specific control?Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melissa E MossDepartment of Psychology.
Atsushi KikumotoDepartment of Psychology.
Ulrich MayrDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-7512-4556

Funding

Capturing Control Dynamics Via Eye-Movements: General and Age-Comparative AnalyseR01AG037564 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI MAYR, ULRICH E · 2013 to 2017
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical considerations and results from individual differences studies suggest that working memory and conflict resolution are interrelated functions. Yet, there is little direct evidence suggesting that they actually share common cognitive resources. To study how overcoming conflict influences the maintenance of working memory representations and vice versa, we conducted 4 experiments using a dual-task paradigm in which both working memory load and level of conflict were independently manipulated. Participants performed an auditory Stroop task ("high" or "low" spoken in high/low pitch), which was presented during the retention period of a visual change detection task (Experiments 1-4) or simultaneously with the working memory encoding phase (Experiment 2-4). Across the 4 experiments, we found no consistent interaction between level of conflict and working memory load on working memory performance, although there was evidence in 2 of the 4 experiments for a small effect on auditory Stroop accuracy (but not on response times). These findings present at best weak evidence for the hypothesis that the maintenance of task goals in working memory is critical for successful conflict resolution. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermNegotiatingHumansReaction TimeStroop Test

Identifiers

PMID31916832
PMCPMC10224720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.