Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916675›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Nonreplication of functional connectivity differences in autism spectrum disorder across multiple sites and denoising strategies.

Ye He, Lisa Byrge, Daniel P Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Complex Systems Perspective on Neuroimaging Studies of Behavior and Its Disorders.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ye HeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0001-7113-8056
Lisa ByrgeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0001-8554-1401
Daniel P KennedyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-5915-0893

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESST32HD007475 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Patrick Kennedy, LINDA B. SMITH · 1995 to 2026
$9.5M
Using complex video stimuli to elucidate atypical brain functioning in ASDR01MH110630 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Patrick Kennedy · 2017 to 2026
$5.6M
Investigating Brain Connectivity in Autism at the Whole-Brain LevelR00MH094409 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KENNEDY, DANIEL PATRICK · 2012 to 2014
$714k
Translational Developmental Neuroscience of AutismK23MH087770 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DI MARTINO, ADRIANA · 2010 to 2013
$644k
Enhancing the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange to Define the Autism ConnectomeR21MH107045 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DI MARTINO, ADRIANA · 2015 to 2016
$479k
Enhancement of the 1000 Functional Connectome ProjectR03MH096321 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI BISWAL, BHARAT BHUSAN, MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER · 2012 to 2013
$158k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007475NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH087770NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH094409NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110630NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH096321NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH107045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rapidly growing number of studies on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have used resting-state fMRI to identify alterations of functional connectivity, with the hope of identifying clinical biomarkers or underlying neural mechanisms. However, results have been largely inconsistent across studies, and there remains a pressing need to determine the primary factors influencing replicability. Here, we used resting-state fMRI data from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange to investigate two potential factors: denoising strategy and data site (which differ in terms of sample, data acquisition, etc.). We examined the similarity of both group-averaged functional connectomes and group-level differences (ASD vs. control) across 33 denoising pipelines and four independently-acquired datasets. The group-averaged connectomes were highly consistent across pipelines (r = 0.92 ± 0.06) and sites (r = 0.88 ± 0.02). However, the group differences, while still consistent within site across pipelines (r = 0.76 ± 0.12), were highly inconsistent across sites regardless of choice of denoising strategies (r = 0.07 ± 0.04), suggesting lack of replication may be strongly influenced by site and/or cohort differences. Across-site similarity remained low even when considering the data at a large-scale network level or when considering only the most significant edges. We further show through an extensive literature survey that the parameters chosen in the current study (i.e., sample size, age range, preprocessing methods) are quite representative of the published literature. These results highlight the importance of examining replicability in future studies of ASD, and, more generally, call for extra caution when interpreting alterations in functional connectivity across groups of individuals.

Indexed as

AdolescentArtifactsAutism Spectrum DisorderChildConnectomeFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysReproducibility of ResultsWhite MatterautismfcMRIfunctional connectivityreplicationresting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID31916675
PMCPMC7268009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.