Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916344›Full record

ArticleGeriatrics & gerontology international2020

Development and validity of the Computer-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool for intervention in community-dwelling older individuals.

Junta Takahashi, Hisashi Kawai, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yoshinori Fujiwara, Yutaka Watanabe, Hirohiko Hirano, Hunkyung Kim, Kazushige Ihara, Akiko Miki, Shuichi Obuchi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Junta TakahashiTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8599-6107
Hisashi KawaiTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3015-6041
Hiroyuki SuzukiTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinori FujiwaraTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka WatanabeTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4983-2399
Hirohiko HiranoTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Hunkyung KimTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1614-5477
Kazushige IharaDepartment of Social Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan.
Akiko MikiTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuichi ObuchiTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15K01469Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K01853National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology 28-30National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology 29-42
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe Mini-Mental State Examination is a widely used cognitive assessment tool. However, it has several limitations, including the learning effect and interrater reliability. Therefore, we developed a Computer-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool (CompBased-CAT), which runs on a tablet or personal computer. In this study, we examined the validity and discrimination ability of the CompBased-CAT.

methodsParticipants were recruited from the Otasha-Kenshin study carried out in 2016. We included 773 community-dwelling older individuals in Japan (332 men, 441 women, aged 65-97 years). CompBased-CAT scores were converted to z-scores, and the correlation with Mini-Mental State Examination scores was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Furthermore, the ability to discern cognitive impairment was examined using the receiver operating characteristic curve.

resultsThe Pearson's correlation coefficient for the Mini-Mental State Examination scores and each task component of the CompBased-CAT ranged from 0.24 to 0.41 (P < 0.001), and the correlation coefficient of the total z-scores was 0.51 (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the discriminating ability of the CompBased-CATool for cognitive impairment were 0.81, 0.77 and 0.85, respectively.

conclusionsThe CompBased-CAT certainly possesses validity, discriminating ability and utility as a new cognitive assessment tool in community-dwelling older individuals. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; ••: ••-••.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCognitionCognitive DysfunctionDementiaDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansIndependent LivingJapanMaleMass ScreeningMental Status and Dementia TestsReproducibility of ResultsROC Curveassessmentcognitive functioncommunity-dwelling elderlydementiascreening

Identifiers

PMID31916344
PMCPMC7065126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.