ArticleGeriatrics & gerontology international2020
Development and validity of the Computer-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool for intervention in community-dwelling older individuals.
Article in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability Analysis of MMSE-K and Tablet PC-Based MMSE-K Kit in Patients with Neurologic Disease.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Speech-to-Text Transcription in a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Older Adults.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- A Longitudinal Study of CogEvo's Prediction of Cognitive Decline in Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a self-administered computerized cognitive assessment based on automatic speech recognition.PloS one · 2024Article
- Digital Cognitive Assessment Tests for Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review.JMIR mental health · 2023Review
- Digital Cognitive Biomarker for Mild Cognitive Impairments and Dementia: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Simple screening models for cognitive impairment in community settings: The IRIDE Cohort Study.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2022Article
- Update and review of the gerodontology prospective for 2020's: Linking the interactions of oral (hypo)-functions to health vs. systemic diseases.Journal of dental sciences · 2021Review
- Development and validity of the Computer-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool for intervention in community-dwelling older individuals.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2020Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence detection of cognitive impairment in older adults during walking.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe Mini-Mental State Examination is a widely used cognitive assessment tool. However, it has several limitations, including the learning effect and interrater reliability. Therefore, we developed a Computer-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool (CompBased-CAT), which runs on a tablet or personal computer. In this study, we examined the validity and discrimination ability of the CompBased-CAT.
methodsParticipants were recruited from the Otasha-Kenshin study carried out in 2016. We included 773 community-dwelling older individuals in Japan (332 men, 441 women, aged 65-97 years). CompBased-CAT scores were converted to z-scores, and the correlation with Mini-Mental State Examination scores was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Furthermore, the ability to discern cognitive impairment was examined using the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsThe Pearson's correlation coefficient for the Mini-Mental State Examination scores and each task component of the CompBased-CAT ranged from 0.24 to 0.41 (P < 0.001), and the correlation coefficient of the total z-scores was 0.51 (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the discriminating ability of the CompBased-CATool for cognitive impairment were 0.81, 0.77 and 0.85, respectively.
conclusionsThe CompBased-CAT certainly possesses validity, discriminating ability and utility as a new cognitive assessment tool in community-dwelling older individuals. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; ••: ••-••.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.