ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020
Novel classifiers with clinical laboratory parameters for early detection of osteosarcoma.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Proliferation of Osteosarcoma: The Impact of Phenol and Ethanol on Ki-67 Expressions.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Circulating Long Non-Coding RNAs as Novel Potential Biomarkers for Osteogenic Sarcoma.Cancers · 2021Review
- Novel classifiers with clinical laboratory parameters for early detection of osteosarcoma.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteosarcoma (OS) is one of the most common malignant bone tumors. It is essential to explore early diagnostic indicators with high sensitivity and specificity due to the rapid progression and metastasis of OS and the poor survival of metastatic OS patients. However, a few indicators of diagnostic significance have been described.
methodsA total of 458 OS patients, 312 healthy individuals, and 228 patients with primary benign bone lesions were included. Logistic regression was performed on 46 clinical laboratory parameters to establish the diagnostic classifiers, which were evaluated by analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsWe established three diagnostic classifiers, called C
conclusionOur study suggests the potential of C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.