Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916274›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2020

Behavioral predictors of pairing success in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Rhonda P MacAllister, Allison Heagerty, Kristine Coleman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pairing Laboratory-Housed Adult Male Rhesus Macaques (Applied animal behaviour science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Single-dose Diazepam Administration Improves Pairing Success of Unfamiliar Adult Male Rhesus Macaques (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  9. Sex Differences in Hierarchical Stability in a Formation of a Mixed-sex Group of Rhesus Macaques.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rhonda P MacAllisterDivision of Comparative Medicine, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-9937-7662
Allison HeagertyDivision of Comparative Medicine, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-2550-4198
Kristine ColemanDivision of Comparative Medicine, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Oregon National Primate Research Center · US

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pair housing is one of the most important components of behavioral management for caged macaques; however, it can result in aggression and injury if partners are incompatible. Knowing when to proceed and when to stop social introductions can be challenging, and can have consequences for the partners. We examined whether behavior early in social introductions predicted success (i.e., partners remained cohoused with full contact for at least 28 days) in 724 female-female and 477 male-male rhesus macaque pairs. We took cage side one-zero focal observations on pairs during the first 2 days of full contact, recording social and aggressive behaviors. The majority of pairs (79.6% of female and 83.0% of male) were successful. The most common behaviors exhibited by pairs during these observations were maintaining proximity, tandem threats, and anxiety. Mounting was also relatively common in male pairs. Grooming and close social contact (e.g., touching) were not common in our study. Several behaviors observed on Day 1 significantly predicted pairing success. For females, these included proximity, tandem threat, rump present, mount, and groom. Day 1 predictors of success for male pairs included proximity, tandem threat, rump present, mount, and social contact. Fewer behaviors predicted success on Day 2. Maintaining proximity on Day 2 predicted success for both sexes, but tandem threat predicted success only for females. Behaviors that predicted incompatibility for females on Day 1 included displace, grimace, threat, bite, and other aggressive contacts. Day 1 predictors of separation for male pairs were displaced, grimace, and abnormal behavior. The only Day 2 behavior that correlated with incompatibility was grimace, which was predictive for males. Interestingly, aggression did not predict incompatibility for male pairs. Identifying behaviors exhibited by monkeys early in the pair introduction that are predictive of long-term compatibility can shape pairing decisions, reducing later stress and potential injury.

Indexed as

Macaca mulattaSocial BehaviorAggressionAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleHousing, AnimalMaleaggressioncompatibilitypair housing

Identifiers

PMID31916274
PMCPMC7780571
OpenAlexW3000286824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.