ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021
Evaluation of accuracy of capillary refill index with pneumatic fingertip compression.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04366310 (Capillary Refill Index Measurement with a Temperature Control Procedure), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Capillary Refill Index Measurement with a Temperature Control Procedure
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral perfusion noninvasive monitoring technologies - a literature and patent review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Impaired tissue perfusion in high-risk patients having major abdominal surgery: a multicenter observational study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Microcirculation Monitoring in Septic Shock: Focused Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- DiCARTJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
- The intricate relationship between capillary refill time and systemic hemodynamics in septic shock.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Research Progress on the Measurement Methods and Clinical Significance of Capillary Refill Time.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Agreement between Capillary Refill Time measured at Finger and Earlobe sites in different positions: a pilot prospective study on healthy volunteers.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Observational
- Elucidation of Ischemic Mechanisms of Early Pressure Injury during Post-Decompression and Detecting Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- What is new in microcirculation and tissue oxygenation monitoring?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Review
- Full Finger Reperfusion Time Measured by Pulse Oximeter Waveform Analysis in Children.Critical care medicine · 2020Observational
- Pulse oximetry-based capillary refilling evaluation predicts postoperative outcomes in liver transplantation: a prospective observational cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2020Observational
- Cutting-Edge Technology for Rapid Bedside Assessment of Capillary Refill Time for Early Diagnosis and Resuscitation of Sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Advances in the Approaches Using Peripheral Perfusion for Monitoring Hemodynamic Status.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capillary refill time (CRT) is a method of measuring a patient's peripheral perfusion status through a visual assessment performed by a clinician. We developed a new method of measuring CRT using standard pulse oximetry sensor, which was designated capillary refill index (CRI). We evaluated the accuracy of CRI in comparison to CRT image analysis. Thirty healthy adult volunteers were recruited for a derivation study and 30 patients in the emergency department (ED) were for validation. Our high fidelity mechanical device compresses and releases the fingertip to measure changes in blood volume using infrared-light (940 nm). CRT was calculated by image analysis software using recorded fingertip videos. CRI and CRT were measured at: room temperature (ROOM TEMP), 15 °C cold water (COLD), and 38 °C warm water (REWARM). Intra-rater reliability, Bland-Altman plots, and correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the accuracy of the novel CRI method. CRI (4.9 [95% CI 4.5-5.3] s) and CRT (4.0 [3.6-4.3]) in the COLD group were higher than the ROOM TEMP and REWARM groups. High intra-rater reliability was observed in both measurements (0.97 [0.95-0.98] and 0.98 [0.97-0.99], respectively). The Bland-Altman plots suggested a systematic bias: CRI was consistently higher than CRT (difference: + 1.01 s). There was a strong correlation between CRI and CRT (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). ED patients had higher CRI (3.91 [5.05-2.75]) and CRT (2.21 [3.19-1.23]) than those of healthy volunteers at room temperature. The same difference and correlation patterns were verified in the ED setting. CRI was as reliable as CRT by image analysis. The values of CRI was approximately 1 s higher than CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31916222What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.