Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916222›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

Evaluation of accuracy of capillary refill index with pneumatic fingertip compression.

Koichiro Shinozaki, Kota Saeki, Lee S Jacobson, Julianne M Falotico, Timmy Li, Hideaki Hirahara, Katsuyuki Horie, Naoki Kobayashi, Steve Weisner, Joshua W Lampe and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04366310 (Capillary Refill Index Measurement with a Temperature Control Procedure), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04366310 terminatednot on this map

Capillary Refill Index Measurement with a Temperature Control Procedure

TypeobservationalSponsorNihon KohdenRan2020 to 2023Enrolled65ConditionsPeripheral PerfusionArmscapillary refill index, rewarming
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. DiCARTJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. What is new in microcirculation and tissue oxygenation monitoring?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Koichiro ShinozakiThe Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 350 Community Dr., Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA. shino@gk9.so-net.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-228X
Kota SaekiNihon Kohden Innovation Center, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lee S JacobsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Julianne M FaloticoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Timmy LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Northshore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Hideaki HiraharaNihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsuyuki HorieNihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki KobayashiNihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Steve WeisnerNihon Kohden Innovation Center, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Joshua W LampeThe Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 350 Community Dr., Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Lance B BeckerThe Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 350 Community Dr., Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capillary refill time (CRT) is a method of measuring a patient's peripheral perfusion status through a visual assessment performed by a clinician. We developed a new method of measuring CRT using standard pulse oximetry sensor, which was designated capillary refill index (CRI). We evaluated the accuracy of CRI in comparison to CRT image analysis. Thirty healthy adult volunteers were recruited for a derivation study and 30 patients in the emergency department (ED) were for validation. Our high fidelity mechanical device compresses and releases the fingertip to measure changes in blood volume using infrared-light (940 nm). CRT was calculated by image analysis software using recorded fingertip videos. CRI and CRT were measured at: room temperature (ROOM TEMP), 15 °C cold water (COLD), and 38 °C warm water (REWARM). Intra-rater reliability, Bland-Altman plots, and correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the accuracy of the novel CRI method. CRI (4.9 [95% CI 4.5-5.3] s) and CRT (4.0 [3.6-4.3]) in the COLD group were higher than the ROOM TEMP and REWARM groups. High intra-rater reliability was observed in both measurements (0.97 [0.95-0.98] and 0.98 [0.97-0.99], respectively). The Bland-Altman plots suggested a systematic bias: CRI was consistently higher than CRT (difference: + 1.01 s). There was a strong correlation between CRI and CRT (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). ED patients had higher CRI (3.91 [5.05-2.75]) and CRT (2.21 [3.19-1.23]) than those of healthy volunteers at room temperature. The same difference and correlation patterns were verified in the ED setting. CRI was as reliable as CRT by image analysis. The values of CRI was approximately 1 s higher than CRT.

Indexed as

CapillariesHemodynamicsAdultFingersHumansOximetryReproducibility of ResultsAccuracyCapillary refill indexCapillary refill timeMonitoringPeripheral perfusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.