Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916172›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

MOA-based linear and nonlinear QSAR models for predicting the toxicity of organic chemicals to Vibrio fischeri.

Shengnan Zhang, Ning Wang, Limin Su, Xiaoyan Xu, Chao Li, Weichao Qin, Yuanhui Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A Benchmark Study of Graph Models for Molecular Acute Toxicity Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Dose-effect and structure-activity relationships of haloquinoline toxicity towards Vibrio fischeri.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shengnan ZhangState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130117, People's Republic of China.
Ning WangCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong, 266100, People's Republic of China.
Limin SuState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130117, People's Republic of China. sulm932@nenu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7601-1193
Xiaoyan XuState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130117, People's Republic of China.
Chao LiState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130117, People's Republic of China.
Weichao QinState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130117, People's Republic of China.
Yuanhui ZhaoState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130117, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2412018ZD014National Natural Science Foundation of China 21107012National Natural Science Foundation of China 21777022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk assessment of pollutants to humans and ecosystems requires much toxicological data. However, experimental testing of compounds expends a large number of animals and is criticized for ethical reasons. The in silico method is playing an important role in filling the data gap. In this paper, the acute toxicity data of 1221 chemicals to Vibrio fischeri were collected. The global models obtained showed that there was a poor relationship between the toxicity data and the descriptors calculated based on linear and nonlinear regression analysis. This is due to the fact that the studied compounds contain not only non-reactive compounds but also reactive and specifically acting compounds with different modes of action (MOAs). MOAs are fundamental for the development of mechanistically based QSAR models and toxicity prediction. To investigate MOAs and develop MOA-based prediction models, the compounds were classified into baseline, less inert, reactive, and specifically acting compounds based on the modified Verhaar's classification scheme. Satisfactory models were established by multivariate linear regression (MLR) and support vector machine (SVM) analysis not only for baseline and less inert chemicals, but also for reactive and specifically acting compounds. Compared with linear models obtained by the MLR method, the nonlinear models obtained by the SVM method had better performance. The cross validation proved that all of the models were robust except for those for reactive chemicals with nN (number of nitrogen atoms) = 0 and n(C=O) (number of carbonyl groups) > 0 (Q

Indexed as

Aliivibrio fischeriQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAnimalsComputer SimulationEcosystemHumansLinear ModelsOrganic ChemicalsOrganic ChemicalsIn silico methodMode of actionMultivariate linear regressionQSARSupport vector machineVerhaar schemeVibrio fischer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.