Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916139›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2020

Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Work Ability Index in Working Individuals.

Claudio Bascour-Sandoval, Francisco Soto-Rodríguez, Claudio Muñoz-Poblete, Gabriel Nasri Marzuca-Nassr

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Psychometric Properties of the Work Ability Index in Health Centre Workers in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Influence of age on functional capacity and work ability in Chilean workers: a cross-sectional study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Claudio Bascour-SandovalDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-6250-8518
Francisco Soto-RodríguezDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Claudio Muñoz-PobleteDepartamento de Salud Pública, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Gabriel Nasri Marzuca-NassrDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Claro Solar 115, oficina 300, Edificio SA, Temuco, Chile. gabriel.marzuca@ufrontera.cl.ORCID 0000-0002-4835-7821
Universidad de La Frontera · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is increasingly important to have validated instruments to assess the ability to work. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Work Ability Index (WAI) in working individuals. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 360 workers (men and women) in a high-complexity public hospital and in a public university. The participants were between 40 and 75 years, with a contract of at least 11 h weekly. The ability to work was assessed using the WAI and the perception of health through the Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36 v2). The concurrent validity was analyzed, correlating the WAI with the SF-36 v2. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to test construct validity. In addition, the internal consistency of the WAI was analyzed using the standardized Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The WAI showed a positive and statistically significant correlation (p < 0.001) with the SF-36 v2. The exploratory factor analysis showed three factors interpreted as, "Mental Resources", "Diseases and Health-Related Restrictions", and "Self-perception of Work Ability". The reliability of the factors was acceptable, except for the second factor, which was poor. The WAI demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, such as internal consistency, concurrent and construct validity, constituting a reliable instrument to measure work ability for the population of active working individuals in the service sector.

Indexed as

Work Capacity EvaluationAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsPsychometric propertiesReliabilityValidityWork Ability IndexWorkers

Identifiers

PMID31916139
OpenAlexW2999723652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.