Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916120›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

Development of Decisional Values Statements for Lung Cancer Screening Among African American Smokers.

Randi M Williams, Kenneth H Beck, James Butler, Sunmin Lee, Min Qi Wang, Kathryn L Taylor, Cheryl L Knott

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Randi M WilliamsDepartment of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA. rmw27@georgetown.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-9281
Kenneth H BeckDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
James ButlerDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Sunmin LeeDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Min Qi WangDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Kathryn L TaylorDepartment of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Cheryl L KnottDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Funding

Integrating Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Interventions into Lung Cancer Screening Programs: A Randomized TrialR01CA207228 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, KATHRYN L · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer screening via low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been underutilized by high-risk current and former smokers since its approval in 2013. Further, lower use of other evidence-based cancer screening tests (e.g., colorectal cancer, breast cancer) has been noted among African Americans when compared with other racial and ethnic groups. Reasons for low uptake are multilayered but include the need for consideration of patients' personal values about the screening decision. The goal of the present study was to (1) identify positive and negative factors specific to lung cancer screening via LDCT and (2) develop statements to capture values about the screening test for use in a new measure of decisional values. Key informant interviews (n = 9) identified several benefits and risks of lung cancer screening that may be important to African American smokers. Based on these interviews, a pool of items with the values statements was administered to a convenience sample of 119 African Americans [aged 55-80 years, current or former smokers (who quit < 15 years), and without lung cancer]. An exploratory factor analysis revealed two components explaining 64% of the variance: cons of screening (e.g., "make you feel badly about your smoking history") and pros of screening (e.g., "lowering your risk of dying from lung cancer"). The final 12-item measure had very good internal consistency (α = 0.89 overall; α = 0.86 and 0.88 for subscales, respectively). This tool provides a promising values measure for lung cancer screening among African Americans and could inform future values clarification tools promoting informed and shared decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedSmokersTomography, X-Ray ComputedAfrican AmericansDecisional valuesInformed decision-makingLow-dose computed tomographyLung cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID31916120
PMCPMC7333917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.