Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916102›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020

Characterization of the arterial enhancement pattern of focal liver lesions by multiple arterial phase magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia.

Marco Gatti, Marco Calandri, Laura Bergamasco, Fatemeh Darvizeh, Luigi Grazioli, Riccardo Inchingolo, Davide Ippolito, Stefano Rousset, Andrea Veltri, Paolo Fonio and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco GattiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy. marcogatti17@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8168-5280
Marco CalandriDepartment of Oncology, Radiology Unit, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-0700
Laura BergamascoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0160-0898
Fatemeh DarvizehDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3735-0472
Luigi GrazioliDepartment of Radiology, University of Brescia "Spedali Civili", P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2345-1571
Riccardo InchingoloDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Madonna delle Grazie Hospital, 75100, Matera, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0253-5936
Davide IppolitoSchool of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2696-7047
Stefano RoussetDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4586-7209
Andrea VeltriDepartment of Oncology, Radiology Unit, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7153-063X
Paolo FonioDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-2990
Riccardo FalettiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Unit, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-8637
University of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITDepartment of Medical Sciences · BYOspedale Madonna Delle Grazie · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the features of arterial enhancement pattern of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by triple-phase arterial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsData were retrospectively collected from 52 consecutive patients who underwent triple-phase arterial MRI using hepatocyte-specific contrast agents (Gd-EOB-DTPA) from January 2017 to October 2017, with a MR imaging diagnosis of HCC or FNH. The images were independently assessed by two blinded readers. Contrast enhancement ratio (CER) and liver-to-lesion contrast ratio (LLCR) were calculated. The lesions were classified visually and also based on the peak of LLCR into the following groups: (1) early arterial, (2) middle arterial and (3) late arterial. Data were eventually analysed using nonparametric tests.

resultsThe CER analysis showed no significant difference between HCC and FNH patients (p > 0.05). LLCR

conclusionThe optimal visualization of FNH has been detected in early and middle arterial phases while HCC has been best observed during middle and late arterial phases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleFocal Nodular HyperplasiaHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesFocal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)Gadoxetic acidHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)Magnetic resonance imagingMultiple arterial phase

Identifiers

PMID31916102
OpenAlexW2999277853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.