Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916100›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2020

Potential of Glioblastoma-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy.

Ryan D Salinas, Joseph S Durgin, Donald M O'Rourke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Theranostics · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Children: Techniques and Applications.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  16. GD2 CAR T cells against human glioblastoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan D SalinasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0431-5785
Joseph S DurginDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Donald M O'RourkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Donald.orourke@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001880 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEAGHER, EMMA ANNE · 2016 to 2025
$10.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the established efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in hematologic malignancies, translating CAR T therapy to solid tumors has remained investigational. Glioblastoma, the most aggressive and lethal form of primary brain tumor, has recently been among the malignancies being trialed clinically with CAR T cells. Glioblastoma in particular holds several unique features that have hindered clinical translation, including its vast intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity, associated immunosuppressive environment, and lack of clear experimental models to predict response and analyze resistant phenotypes. Here, we review the history of CAR T therapy development, its current progress in treating glioblastoma, as well as the current challenges and future directions in establishing CAR T therapy as a viable alternative to the current standard of care. Tremendous efforts are currently ongoing to identify novel CAR targets and target combinations for glioblastoma, to modify T cells to enhance their efficacy and to enable them to resist tumor-mediated immunosuppression, and to utilize adjunct therapies such as lymphodepletion, checkpoint inhibition, and bi-specific engagers to improve CAR T persistence. Furthermore, new preclinical models of CAR T therapy are being developed that better reflect the clinical features seen in human trials. Current clinical trials that rapidly incorporate key preclinical findings to patient translation are emerging.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID31916100
OpenAlexW3000509316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.