ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
Configuration design and correction ability evaluation of a novel external fixator for foot and ankle deformity treated by U osteotomy.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of external fixators in developing countries: a short socioeconomic analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a basic osteotomy technique, U osteotomy can be applied for certain complex foot and ankle deformities. Gradual correction cases using Ilizarov apparatus and Taylor Spatial Frame have been reported. This paper proposes a novel parallel distraction apparatus for U osteotomy (PDA-Uos) to supplement the correction equipment for surgeon. Designed with an adjustable structure, the PDA-Uos can adopt different assembly shapes (joint connection points). However, the influence of the change in assembly shape on interference-free workspace and self-structural performance of the external fixator have received little attention. To address this issue and enhance the selection of the most suitable assembly shape for patient, an algorithm to obtain the interference-free workspace of different assembly shapes is proposed based on the inverse position solution of the PDA-Uos. Additionally, correction ability indices are defined according to the requirements of accurately controlled motion and high structural stiffness of the external fixator along the correction path. The results of simulation cases indicate that the interference-free workspace and the correction ability vary according to the assembly shape and thus the proposed method can be used to select an assembly shape with sufficient workspace and the best correction ability before performing correction for a given patient. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31916075What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.