Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31916020›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2020

A comparative study of the efficacy of fractional neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser therapy alone and in combination with erbium:YAG laser therapy: tracing and objective measurement of melanin index in macular amyloidosis.

Mohammad Ali Nilforoushzadeh, Sara Zolghadr, Maryam Heidari-Kharaji, Shiva Alavi, Mona Mahmoudbeyk

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad Ali NilforoushzadehSkin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sara ZolghadrSkin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. s.zolghadrr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4198-3993
Maryam Heidari-KharajiSkin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shiva AlaviSkin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mona MahmoudbeykSkin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRMilad Hospital · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macular amyloidosis (MA) is a common form of primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis, characterized by the eruption of brown pigments of the skin with a rippled pattern. MA can be of cosmetic concern for patients, and its treatment is challenging. In this study, we aimed to find new effective approaches for MA treatment. A total of 39 patients with the clinical diagnosis of MA were treated with two types of laser therapy, and the effectiveness of each approach was examined. Fractional Q-switched 10.64 nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser therapy was compared with a combination of fractional Q-switched 10.64 nm Nd:YAG laser and long-pulsed fractional erbium:YAG laser therapy. Melanin biometric measurements were performed using a Mexameter, objective image-based evaluation was carried out, and the itching score and patient satisfaction were examined. Mexameter-based analysis showed that both types of laser therapy were effective in the treatment of MA, causing a significant decrease in the amount of melanin in the treated areas (P < 0.05). Also, combination of two types of laser therapy was significantly more effective than one type alone (P < 0.05). The itching score significantly decreased in patients undergoing a combination of laser therapies. Also, a positive correlation was observed between the amount of melanin and degree of itching in the treated areas. Moreover, analysis of patient satisfaction showed that more than 90% of patients had excellent satisfaction with combination laser therapy. The results confirmed the significant positive effects of both fractional Nd:YAG laser alone and in combination with fractional erbium:YAG laser therapy considering the reduction in melanin content; however, combination of two types of laser therapy was more effective than one type alone. Trial registration: IRCT20080901001159N23.

Indexed as

AdultAmyloidosis, FamilialFemaleHumansLasers, Solid-StateMelaninsMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPruritusSkinSkin Diseases, GeneticTreatment OutcomeMelaninsErbium:YAG laserFractional Nd:YAG laserLaserMacular amyloidosisMelanin

Identifiers

PMID31916020
OpenAlexW2999792378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.