ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2020
[Right-sided or left-sided donor nephrectomy-is this really relevant?]
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the context of living donation, the protection of the donor and the outcome are very important aspects. However, the side selection of the donor nephrectomy is also decisive. In this work, the basics of side selection and the question of whether there are differences regarding the left-sided or right-sided donor nephrectomy are considered. MATERIALS AND
methodsLiving kidney donation data of our center between December 2004 and July 2019 were evaluated in terms of withdrawal side, complications and outcome, as well as the current literature in PubMed. Finally, the results from our center are compared with the current literature.
resultsDuring the investigation period, 152 live donations were carried out in our center. In these cases 66 patients had a left-sided and in 86 cases a right-sided donor nephrectomy. One transplant vein thrombosis occurred in each group. Complications and outcome were similar for the recipient in both groups. It was noticed in the current literature that generally more left-sided donor nephrectomies are performed, most likely due to the preference of the surgeon. Although a low significantly increased risk of transplant vein thrombosis after right-sided donor nephrectomy is described, all authors agree that right-sided donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure with good outcome.
conclusionsOur own results and the current literature show that the right-sided donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure with only a slightly increased risk of complications compared to the left side and therefore can be recommended. It is clearly safe for the donor and organ, with an equivalent outcome for the recipient. The results are also dependent on the experience of the surgeon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.