ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020
Management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after sacrocolpopexy. A video case series.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Surgical Challenge of the Repeat Sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation After Failed Sacrocolpopexy: A Case Series.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Is Transvaginal Minimally Invasive Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation a Safe and Effective Surgical Approach for Treating Recurrent Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy-A Surgical Challenge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Safety and medium-term outcome of redo laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a matched case-control study.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy mesh excision step-by-step.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Revision sacrocolpopexy: tips and tricks for optimal outcomes.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- A robotic approach to management of failed sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolpopexy complications: a case series.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this video case series is to demonstrate our experience with the surgical management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after sacrocolpopexy.
methodsThis is a series of seven patients who developed recurrent pelvic organ prolapse stage 2 or greater after sacrocolpopexy. The video shows short clips on the individualized surgical management using a laparoscopic approach.
conclusionThe surgical management of patients with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse poses a great challenge. In our cases the laparoscopic approach gave us the opportunity to diagnose the reason for surgical failure, to optimally restore the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor, and to limit the morbidity that is often seen in repeat surgery. Laparoscopic revision of sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse is feasible but needs to be individualized. As the number of cases is limited, and available evidence is scarce, we recommend the use of a registry to prospectively follow up these patients and identify best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.