ArticleSaudi medical journal2020
Surgical and oncological outcome after laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for non-metastatic, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. A single-centre experience.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Operative approaches and outcomes of nephroureterectomy for UTUC: a network meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy: 5-Year Update of Techniques and Outcomes.Cancers · 2023Review
- Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Comment on: Surgical and oncological outcome after laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for non-metastatic, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. A single-centre experience.Saudi medical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe determined the surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in comparison to open nephroureterectomy (ONU) and factors predicting bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and compared the data of patients who underwent ONU or LNU for non-metastatic, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma from 2000 to 2016. The primary endpoint was to determine bladder cancer recurrence-free survival (BCRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). The data were analysed using Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and Kaplan-Meier curve. Results: Total of 50 patients, of which 24 had LNU and 26 had ONU, met the inclusion criteria. Median durations of follow-up were 4.2 and 6.5 years (p=0.1070) in LNU and ONU, respectively. Operative time, blood loss and hospital stay were significantly lower in the LNU group than in the ONU group (p=0.0001, p=0.0001, p=0.0018). Cancer-specific survival rate in the LNU was 75% and ONU was 73.3% (p=0.1902), whereas BCRFS and CSS were not significantly different in both groups (log-rank test; BCRFS: p=0.809 and CSS: p=0.802). Patients who underwent ureteroscopy with biopsy (p=0.001), had multifocality (p=0.001) and previous history of (H/O) bladder cancer (p=0.020) were at significant risk for developing bladder cancer recurrence after nephroureterectomy. Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy can benefit patients because of its minimal invasiveness, and oncologic outcomes are comparable to ONU. Preoperative ureteroscopy with biopsy, multifocality and previous H/O bladder cancer might be risk factors for bladder cancer recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.