Trial reportSaudi medical journal2020
Online polarity-dependent effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor speed and fine manual dexterity. A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Saudi medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polarity-dependent cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates online functions of the alerting attention network.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2021Trial
- Course induced dexterity development and cerebellar grey matter growth of dentistry students: a randomised trial.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the role of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) in modulating cerebellar functions in the motor domains of fine motor dexterity and motor speed. Methods: A single-blind, randomized sham-controlled study was conducted between January and July 2018 at the neuroscience laboratory of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. A total of 63 healthy participants were assessed for eligibility. Sixty subjects met the criteria of the study and were randomly divided into 3 groups that received anodal, cathodal or sham ctDCS. Subjects performed 2 motor tasks, The Grooved Pegboard test (GPT) assessed fine manual dexterity and the Finger Tapping Task (FTT) assessed motor speed. Subjects undertook the 2 tasks in a single intervention session while 20 minutes of 2mA ctDCS was administered online. The short form of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory was used to assess handedness and both tasks were performed first with the dominant and then the non-dominant hand. The primary outcome measures included the time of completion of GPT for fine manual dexterity and the mean number of finger-taps for motor speed of each hand. Results: ANOVA revealed a highly significant polarity dependent Group*Task interaction (p less than 0.01) for FTT scores. ANOVA also revealed a non-significant Group*Task interaction for GPT scores. Conclusion: Findings indicate that ctDCS has a modulatory effect on motor speed and could be a promising therapeutic intervention for treatment of neurological conditions with motor deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.