Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31915714›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2020

Clinical Outcomes Following the Use of Archived Proviral HIV-1 DNA Genotype to Guide Antiretroviral Therapy Adjustment.

Kristen E Ellis, George T Nawas, Connie Chan, Lawrence York, Julia Fisher, Elizabeth Connick, Tirdad T Zangeneh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Portable Nanopore sequencing solution for next-generation HIV drug resistance testing.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen E EllisDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0047-6722
George T NawasDivision of Clinical and Administrative Sciences, Xavier University of Louisiana College of Pharmacy, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Connie ChanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Lawrence YorkDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Julia FisherStatistics Consulting Laboratory, BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Elizabeth ConnickDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Tirdad T ZangenehDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
University of Arizona · USXavier University of Louisiana · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence regarding the safety of using proviral HIV-1 DNA genotype (DNA GT) to guide antiretroviral therapy (ART) is limited. We hypothesized that HIV RNA would not increase following ART adjustment guided by DNA GT in a university HIV clinic.

methodsData were obtained from electronic medical records of adult persons living with HIV-1 (PWH) who underwent DNA GT testing and changed ART between October 2014 and November 2017. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of ART switch on HIV RNA over time.

resultsEighty-three PWH had DNA GT performed, 66 (80%) switched ART, and 59 had postswitch follow-up. Data were analyzed pre-/postswitch for these 59 PWH (median age, 54 years; 71% LWH ≥10 years; 46% ≥2 previous regimens; 36% recent low-level viremia; 34% unknown medication history). On DNA GT, 58% had ≥1-class ART resistance, 34% ≥2-class, and 10% 3-class. Median follow-up (range) was 337 (34-647) days. There was no change in probability of HIV RNA ≥50 copies/mL over time (

conclusionsDNA GT facilitated changes in ART in a treatment-experienced population without increases in HIV RNA. Decreased pill burden occurred without increased ART cost. Further studies to identify optimal use of DNA GT are needed.

Indexed as

antiretroviral therapyarchived proviral HIV DNA genotypegenotypic antiretroviral resistance testingHIVperipheral blood mononuclear cell DNA

Identifiers

PMID31915714
PMCPMC6942490
OpenAlexW2998080559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.