Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31915586›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Survival between synchronous and non-synchronous multiple primary cutaneous melanomas-a SEER database analysis.

Jie Xiong, Yanlin Su, Zhitong Bing, Bihai Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie XiongDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Changsha University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yanlin SuDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Changsha Central Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zhitong BingEvidence Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Bihai ZhaoDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Changsha University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no criterion to distinguish synchronous and non-synchronous multiple primary cutaneous melanomas (MPMs). This study aimed to distinguish synchronous and non-synchronous MPMs and compare the survivals of them using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

methodsSynchronous and non-synchronous MPMs were distinguished by fitting the double log transformed distribution of the time interval between the first and second primary cutaneous melanomas (TIFtS) through a piecewise linear regression. The overall and melanoma-specific survivals were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model through modeling the occurrence of synchronous MPMs as a time-dependent variable.

resultsThe distribution of TIFtS was composed by three power-law distributions. According to its first inflection point, synchronous MPMs were defined as tumors that occurred within 2 months. The Kaplain-Meier plot revealed a significant inferior survival for synchronous MPMs than non-synchronous MPMs (

conclusionsThis study provided data analysis evidences for using 2 months to distinguish synchronous MPMs and non-synchronous MPMs. Furthermore, the occurrence of synchronous MPM was a risk factor for prognosis of patients with CM.

Indexed as

Multiple primary cutaneous melanoma (MPM)Non-synchronousSurveillance epidemilogy and end results (SEER)SurvivalSynchronous

Identifiers

PMID31915586
PMCPMC6944097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.