Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31915443›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2019

Acupotomy Therapy for Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Jianyu You, Fengyun Yang, Naigang Liu, Nana Tang, Ting Fang, Fushui Liu, Zhongyong Liu, Hongwu Xie

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hydrodilatation with corticosteroids is the most effective conservative management for frozen shoulder.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianyu YouCollege of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4318-292X
Fengyun YangCollege of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-3302
Naigang LiuChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Nana TangCollege of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5708-6955
Ting FangCollege of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3639-987X
Fushui LiuCollege of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-0889
Zhongyong LiuCollege of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-9096
Hongwu XieCollege of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAcupotomy therapy is widely used for pain management. However, the efficacy of acupotomy on shoulder adhesive capsulitis (SAC) is still uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy therapy for SAC.

methodsWe searched seven electronic databases to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupotomy for SAC published before April 2019. A meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane systematic review method by using RevMan 5.3 software.

resultsA total of eight RCTs involving 501 patients were enrolled. Meta-analysis showed that acupotomy was significantly better than the control group in debasing the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (MD = -0.97, 95% CI = [-1.49, -0.45],

conclusionAcupotomy therapy is an effective and safe treatment for SAC, and this treatment can be recommended for the management of SAC. Due to the low quality and small sample size of the included studies, more rigorously designed RCTs with high quality and large-scale are recommended in future.

Identifiers

PMID31915443
PMCPMC6930748
OpenAlexW2995901965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.