ArticleNature protocols2020
A comprehensive guide to dynamic analysis of microbial gene expression using the 3D-printed PFIbox and a fluorescent reporter library.
Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Temporally resolved assays of bacterial gene expression using printed fluorescence imaging boxes (PFIboxes) are non-destructive, inexpensive and simple to prepare. Herein, we describe a full experimental pipeline wherein PFIbox parts are modified and 3D printed, electronics assembled and used to study transcriptional responses of Escherichia coli to chemical stressors. A chemical probe is added to agar growth medium, and a promoter-fluorophore fusion library is arrayed in high density on the agar slab. With high temporal resolution, the reporter library is imaged in PFIboxes, then quantified using promoter activity as a measure of gene expression. PFIboxes have advantages over conventional transcriptomic approaches such as RNA-seq, as the non-destructive nature permits a high-resolution temporal dimension in the data. This results in rapid measurement of transcriptional responses to chemical or physical stimuli. Each time-course gene expression assay costs about US$2 to run, in triplicate, using this method. Printing time depends on printer and settings, but once printed, PFIboxes can be fully assembled, programmed and loaded with samples in less than 1 h. Experimental durations and sampling frequency are set according to user need, but can be run in the duration of a microbial growth curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.