Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31915386›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

Manipulating gene translation in plants by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing of upstream open reading frames.

Xiaomin Si, Huawei Zhang, Yanpeng Wang, Kunling Chen, Caixia Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Maize Anther Development Involves Translated Open Reading Frames From 3' Untranslated Regions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Targeted BDNF upregulation via upstream open reading frame disruption.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Gene Editing inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Plant engineering: advances, bottlenecks, and promise.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaomin SiState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, the Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huawei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, the Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanpeng WangState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, the Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Kunling ChenState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, the Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Caixia GaoState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, the Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. cxgao@genetics.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3169-8248
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression is regulated by multiple processes, and the translation of mRNAs into proteins is an especially critical step. Upstream open reading frames (uORFs) are widespread cis-elements in eukaryotic genes that usually suppress the translation of downstream primary ORFs (pORFs). Here, we describe a protocol for fine-tuning gene translation in plants by editing endogenous uORFs with the CRISPR-Cas9 system. The method we present readily yields transgene-free uorf mutant offspring. We provide detailed protocols for predicting uORFs and testing their effects on downstream pORFs using a dual-luciferase reporter system, designing and constructing single guide RNA (sgRNA)-Cas9 vectors, identifying transgene-free uorf mutants, and finally comparing the mRNA, protein and phenotypic levels of target genes in uorf mutants and controls. Predicting uORFs and confirming their effects in protoplasts takes only 2-3 weeks, and transgene-free mutants with edited target uORFs controlling different levels of pORF translation can be obtained within 4 months. Unlike previous methods, our strategy achieves fine-tuning of gene translation in transgene-free derivatives, which accelerates the analysis of gene function and the improvement of crop traits.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingOpen Reading FramesPlantsProtein Biosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID31915386
OpenAlexW3000155195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.