ArticleThe American journal of case reports2020
Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy and Brugada Syndrome: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brugada syndrome diagnosed in a young woman occurring postpartum: case report and literature review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Neonatal congenital myotonic dystrophy with DMPK gene expansion: clinical features and short-term outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Congenital myotonic dystrophy is a subtype of type 1 myotonic dystrophy presenting in the neonatal period. Cardiac involvement is commonly seen in patients with type 1 myotonic dystrophy beyond the neonatal period. Brugada syndrome is a conduction abnormality associated with a mutation in the sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5 (SCN5A) gene and has been described in adult patients with type 1 myotonic dystrophy. Two cases are presented of type 1 myotonic dystrophy in neonates, one who had family members with a confirmed diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. CASE REPORT Case 1: A female infant at 40 weeks gestational age, birth weight of 3,395 grams was born to a 40-year-old gravida 4, para 3 (G4P3) mother. The mother had previously been diagnosed with Brugada syndrome. Multiple family members were identified and diagnosed with type 1 myotonic dystrophy and Brugada syndrome. The infant is being monitored closely with a plan to perform genetic testing for Brugada syndrome if she develops cardiac conduction abnormalities. Case 2: A male infant at 37 weeks gestational age, with a birth weight of 2,900 grams, was born to a 24-year-old gravida 2, para 1 (G2P1) mother. He was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) secondary to poor respiratory effort and generalized hypotonia. Severe polyhydramnios was diagnosed during pregnancy. The mother had previously been diagnosed with type 1 myotonic dystrophy. CONCLUSIONS Infants with congenital myotonic dystrophy should be carefully monitored for both structural and conduction abnormalities of the heart, supported by genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.