Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31915158›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Preferences for everyday living inventory (PELI): study protocol for piloting a culture-sensitive and setting-specific translated instrument in German care settings (PELI-D).

Tobias Ingo Stacke, Johannes Michael Bergmann, Armin Michael Ströbel, René Müller-Widmer, Daniel Purwins, Christina Manietta, Mike Rommerskirch, Anna-Eva Nebowsky, Anne Wegner, Jane White and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tobias Ingo StackeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten, Witten, Germany tobias-ingo.stacke@dzne.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3556-8128
Johannes Michael BergmannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Armin Michael StröbelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
René Müller-WidmerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Daniel PurwinsGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Christina ManiettaGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Mike RommerskirchGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Anna-Eva NebowskyGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Anne WegnerWrite-English, Cologne, Germany.
Jane WhiteWhite-English Services, Zurich, Switzerland.
Heidemarie KelleterDiocesan Caritas Association for the Archdiocese of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nada RalicDiaconia, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Kimberly Van HaitsmaPolisher Research Institute, Penn State College of Nursing, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Martina RoesGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEArchdiocese of Cologne · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRegardless of the healthcare setting, person-centred care and its implementation in caring for older people are a central issue for those who are responsible as professional caregivers and for those in need of care within the care process. Both aspects encompass the possibility of recognising personal preferences. To provide person-centred care, professional caregivers need to know about the individual preferences of the persons being cared for. Therefore, the PELI (an acronym for 'Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory') instrument was developed at the Polisher Research Institute (USA) for the systematic recording of individual preferences of older people in need of care. There is currently no comparable instrument available in the German language.

methodsAs part of the proposed project PELI-D, all versions of the original PELI instrument (nursing home version) were (1) culture-sensitively translated into German and will be (2) examined in a pilot study for their reliability, feasibility and practicability. For the project PELI-D, we worked together with our practice partners in Germany (Diaconia and Caritas in North Rhine-Westphalia) and collaborated with our partners in the USA who developed the PELI instrument. This study protocol focuses on the pilot study, which will be conducted by the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) (site Witten). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the internal quality control committee of the DZNE (ID number: WI029 PELI-D) and by the ethics committee of the German Society of Nursing Science Duisburg branch office (ID number: 18-010). All personal information will be deidentified with a specific identification code and stored in a secured location apart from the rest of the study data. Only qualified and study-related staff will be allowed access to the data. The results of the study will be distributed nationally and internationally through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and journals for nursing care practice.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyPatient PreferenceSurveys and QuestionnairesActivities of Daily LivingAgedFeasibility StudiesGermanyHealth Services for the AgedHealth Services ResearchHumansNursing HomesPatient-Centered CarePilot ProjectsTranslationsadult daycarehomecarenursing homeperson-centered carepilot studypreferences

Identifiers

PMID31915158
PMCPMC6955533
OpenAlexW3000454416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.