ReviewBMC health services research2020
Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework.
Review in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From guidelines to practice: general practitioners' consensus on indicators for managing selected multimorbidity in primary care in Western Australia.Family practice · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study on patient-centered outpatient service quality in the county-level integrated health organization of Yuhuan, Zhejiang province of China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Dimensions of Health System Performance Assessment: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Key indicators for evaluating Iran's health insurance performance.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the performance of telephone triage service.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- 'Feeling like you can't do anything because you don't know where to start'-Parents' Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Early Detection for Children at Risk of Cerebral Palsy.Child: care, health and development · 2025Article
- Measuring productivity in the healthcare sector: a bibliometric and content analysis.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Community out-of-hours palliative care - 'It's a patchwork of services': A qualitative study exploring care provision.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Engaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Building Connections and Striving to Build Better Futures: A Qualitative Interview Study of Alcohol Recovery Navigators' Practice in the North East of England, UK.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Patient Satisfaction with Primary Health Care Services in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Unlocking potential: a qualitative exploration guiding the implementation and evaluation of professional role substitution models in healthcare.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Measuring performance in allied health professional role substitution models of care: a clinician survey.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Piloting a Hospital Pharmacy Performance Model in the Face of Province-Wide Implementation of Activity-Based Funding in Quebec Health Care Centres.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2024Article
- A comparative analysis of outpatient nutrition clinic scheduling outcomes based on in-person and telehealth patient care delivery modalities.Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Health System Performance and Resilience in Times of Crisis: An Adapted Conceptual Framework.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- From measures to action: can integrating quality measures provide system-wide insights for quality improvement decision making?BMJ health & care informatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe science of measuring and reporting on the performance of healthcare systems is rapidly evolving. In the past decade, across many jurisdictions, organisations tasked with monitoring progress towards reform targets have broadened their purview to take a more system-functioning approach. Their aim is to bring clarity to performance assessment, using relevant and robust concepts - and avoiding reductionist measures - to build a whole-of-system view of performance. Existing performance frameworks are not fully aligned with these developments.
methodsAn eight stage process to develop a conceptual framework incorporated literature review, mapping, categorisation, integration, synthesis and validation of performance constructs that have been used by organisations and researchers in order to assess, reflect and report on healthcare performance.
resultsA total of 19 performance frameworks were identified and included in the review. Existing frameworks mostly adopted either a logic model (inputs, outputs and outcomes), a functional, or a goal-achievement approach. The mapping process identified 110 performance terms and concepts. These were integrated, synthesised and resynthesised to produce a framework that features 12 derived constructs reflecting combinations of patients' needs and expectations; healthcare resources and structures; receipt and experience of healthcare services; healthcare processes, functions and context; and healthcare outcomes. The 12 constructs gauge performance in terms of coverage, accessibility, appropriateness, effectiveness, safety, productivity, efficiency, impact, sustainability, resilience, adaptability and equity. They reflect four performance perspectives (patient, population, delivery organisation and system).
conclusionsInternationally, healthcare systems and researchers have used a variety of terms to categorise indicators of healthcare performance, however few frameworks are based on a theoretically-based conceptual underpinning. The proposed framework incorporates a manageable number of performance domains that together provide a comprehensive assessment, as well as conceptual and operational clarity and coherence that support multifaceted measurement systems for healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.