Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31914984›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Influence of extension stem length and diameter on clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Sheng-Hsun Lee, Hsin-Nung Shih, Chih-Hsiang Chang, Tung-Wu Lu, Yu-Han Chang, Yu-Chih Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheng-Hsun LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan (Republic of China).
Hsin-Nung ShihDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan (Republic of China).
Chih-Hsiang ChangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan (Republic of China).
Tung-Wu LuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan (Republic of China).
Yu-Han ChangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan (Republic of China).
Yu-Chih LinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan (Republic of China). b101092127@tmu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtension stems provide stability to revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Little is known regarding the relationship between stem characteristics and RTKA stability. We aimed to identify the relationship between canal filling ratio (CFR) and aseptic loosening following RTKA.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed demographics, radiographic parameters, and outcomes associated with RTKA performed between 2008 and 2013 in a tertiary hospital. The inclusion criteria were: revision for aseptic loosening, hybrid fixation, minor bone defect, Zimmer® LCCK prosthesis, and follow-up > 24 months. Using the modified Knee Society radiographic scoring system, radiographic prosthesis loosening was defined as a radiolucent line (RLL) score ≥ 9 on the femoral side or ≥ 10 on the tibial side. We utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the cutoff value for stem length and diameter in terms of prosthesis loosening or not. Furthermore, CFR-related parameters were analyzed with logistic regression to clarify their relationships with prosthesis loosening.

resultsProsthesis loosening was detected in 17 of 65 patients included. On logistic regression analysis, male sex and severity of the tibial bone defect were associated with loosening. On multivariate analysis, male sex and bone defect severity were associated with loosening on the femoral side, while malalignment was associated with loosening on the tibial side. Protective factors included femoral CFR > 0.85, CFR > 0.7 for > 2 cm, and CFR > 0.7 for > 4 cm, as well as tibial CFR > 0.85.

conclusionsTo minimize loosening post-RTKA, femoral CFR > 0.7 for > 2 cm and tibial CFR > 0.85 are recommended. Risk factors may include male sex, bone defect severity, and malalignment.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAseptic looseningCanal filling ratioExtension stemRevision total knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31914984
PMCPMC6950863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.