Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31914980›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Home-grown school feeding: assessment of a pilot program in Nepal.

Rachana Manandhar Shrestha, Pepijn Schreinemachers, Mamta Gurung Nyangmi, Manoj Sah, Judy Phuong, Shraddha Manandhar, Ray-Yu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Acceptability of School Menus: A Systematic Review of Assessment Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Facilitating Factors and Opportunities for Local Food Purchases in School Meals in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachana Manandhar ShresthaPresent Address: Department of Community and Global Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Pepijn SchreinemachersEnabling Impact Program, World Vegetable Center, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mamta Gurung NyangmiEducation Support, World Food Programme, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Manoj SahEducation Support, World Food Programme, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Judy PhuongEducation Support, World Food Programme, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Shraddha ManandharPresent Address: Independent Consultant, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ray-Yu YangHealthy Diets Program, World Vegetable Center, 60 Yi-Min Liao, Shanhua, Tainan, 74151, Taiwan, Republic of China. ray-yu.yang@worldveg.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-3943

Funding

U.S. Department of Agriculture FFE-367-2017/021-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Nepal School Meals Program reached 600,000 schoolchildren in basic education in 2017 and plays a key role in the government's strategy to increase children's academic and nutritional outcomes. A large part of the program is implemented through cash transfers with schools responsible for the school meal delivery. Home-grown school feeding, an approach in which local communities are given greater control over the school meals program and part of the food is sourced locally, may strengthen local ownership and improve meal quality, but there is a lack of evidence for impact.

methodsThis study piloted home-grown school feeding in 30 schools reaching nearly 4000 children in Sindhupalchok and Bardiya districts in Nepal with the aim to assess operations and outcomes in comparison to the regular cash-based school meals program. The study used a one-time post evaluation with a mixed methods approach. Qualitative data were collected through 12 focus group discussions and 28 key informant interviews with government and school staff, parents, cooks, cooperative members, World Food Programme representatives and other stakeholders involved in the pilot program. The quantitative part applied a quasi-experimental design and used cross-sectional data collected from 1512 children in 30 pilot and 30 control schools.

resultsThe quantitative data indicated that children in the pilot schools had a significantly higher provision of midday school meals (+ 19%; p < 0.01) and a higher school meal quality in terms of dietary diversity (+ 44%; p < 0.01) and nutritional content (e.g. a 21%-points higher consumption of vitamin A-rich fruit and vegetables; p < 0.01). The qualitative data identified key drivers of these positive outcomes as the use of standard meal options, capacity building of local stakeholders, strengthened community ownership and accountability mechanisms, and local food supply chains. Maintaining the observed gains would require a 20-33% increase in the current budget per school meal in addition to the cost of capacity building.

conclusionsThis study for Nepal shows that home-grown school feeding strengthened operations of the school meals program and led to a significantly higher meal provision and quality of school meals.

Indexed as

Community NetworksSchoolsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood ServicesFood SupplyHumansMaleMealsNepalPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationAgricultureChildrenDietary qualityImpactNutrition and healthNutrition-sensitive learningSchool meal

Identifiers

PMID31914980
PMCPMC6950908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.