Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31914970›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Latent class analysis of sexual health markers among men and women participating in a British probability sample survey.

Alison Parkes, Michael Waltenberger, Catherine Mercer, Anne Johnson, Kaye Wellings, Kirstin Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Undisclosed Sexual Risk Exposures: Results of a Nationwide Compliance Study among Whole Blood Donors in Germany.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alison ParkesMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield St, Glasgow, UK. alison.parkes@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-8041
Michael WaltenbergerMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield St, Glasgow, UK.
Catherine MercerUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, Off Capper Street, London, UK.
Anne JohnsonUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, Off Capper Street, London, UK.
Kaye WellingsFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Tavistock Place, London, UK.
Kirstin MitchellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Top floor, 200 Renfield St, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Medical Research Council G0701757Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite known associations between different aspects of sexual health, it is not clear how patterning of adverse sexual health varies across the general population. A better understanding should contribute towards more effective problem identification, prevention and treatment. We sought to identify different clusters of sexual health markers in a general population, along with their socio-demographic, health and lifestyle correlates.

methodsData came from men (N = 5113) and women (N = 7019) aged 16-74 who reported partnered sexual activity in the past year in Britain's third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, undertaken in 2010-2012. Latent class analysis used 18 self-reported variables relating to adverse sexual health outcomes (STI and unplanned pregnancy, non-volitional sex, and sexual function problems). Correlates included socio-demographics, early debut, alcohol/drug use, depression, and satisfaction/distress with sex life.

resultsFour classes were found for men (labelled Good Sexual Health 83%, Wary Risk-takers 4%, Unwary Risk-takers 4%, Sexual Function Problems 9%); six for women (Good Sexual Health 52%, Wary Risk-takers 2%, Unwary Risk-takers 7%, Low Interest 29%, Sexual Function Problems 7%, Highly Vulnerable 2%). Regardless of gender, Unwary Risk-takers reported lower STI/HIV risk perception and more condomless sex than Wary Risk-takers, but both were more likely to report STI diagnosis than Good Sexual Health classes. Highly Vulnerable women reported abortion, STIs and functional problems, and more sexual coercion than other women. Distinct socio-demographic profiles differentiated higher-risk classes from Good Sexual Health classes, with depression, alcohol/drug use, and early sexual debut widely-shared correlates of higher-risk classes. Females in higher-risk classes, and men with functional problems, evaluated their sex lives more negatively than those with Good Sexual Health.

conclusionsA greater prevalence and diversity of poor sexual health appears to exist among women than men in Britain, with more consistent effects on women's subjective sexual well-being. Shared health and lifestyle characteristics of higher-risk groups suggest widespread benefits of upstream interventions. Several groups could benefit from tailored interventions: men and women who underestimate their STI/HIV risk exposure, women distressed by low interest in sex, and women experiencing multiple adverse outcomes. Distinctive socio-demographic profiles should assist with identification and targeting.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesHealth Status IndicatorsSexual HealthAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedSampling StudiesSex FactorsUnited KingdomYoung AdultSexual coercionSexual functionSexual healthSexually transmitted infectionSexual wellbeingUnplanned pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31914970
PMCPMC6950902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.