Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31914956›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2020

Macular vessel density versus ganglion cell complex thickness for detection of early primary open-angle glaucoma.

Yiwei Wang, Chen Xin, Meng Li, David L Swain, Kai Cao, Huaizhou Wang, Ningli Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiwei WangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Chen XinBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Meng LiBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
David L SwainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-9712
Kai CaoBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Huaizhou WangBeijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ningli WangBeijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. wningli@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-4482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the macular vessel density (VD) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in pre-perimetric (PPG) and early perimetric primary open-angle glaucoma (PG) eyes, and to compare the diagnostic ability of the two measurements to discriminate PPG and early PG eyes from healthy eyes.

methodsSeventy-nine eyes in 72 subjects (31 normal, 26 PPG, and 22 early PG eyes) were included in the consecutive case series. Macular VD and GCC thickness were acquired simultaneously using the 6 × 6 mm

resultsCompared to healthy eyes, whole image VD (wiVD) and GCC thickness were significantly lower in PPG and early PG eyes (all P < 0.025). The percent reduction of wiVD was lower than that of GCC thickness in early PG eyes (P < 0.05), while they were similar in PPG eyes (P > 0.05). Regionally, greater VD attenuation and GCC thinning were identified in the perifovea than in the parafovea in both groups (all P < 0.05). Moreover, the percent reduction of VD was less than that of GCC thickness in the perifoveal region in PPG eyes (P < 0.05). The AUROCs for wiVD and GCC thickness were 0.824 and 0.881, respectively, in PPG eyes (P > 0.05), and 0.918 and 0.977, respectively, in early PG eyes (P > 0.05).

conclusionsMacular VD and GCC thickness significantly decreased in PPG and early PG eyes. The perifoveal region appeared to be more vulnerable to macular VD attenuation and GCC thinning in early glaucoma. Our results showed that macular VD measurements may be helpful for detecting and understanding early glaucomatous damage.

Indexed as

AgedArea Under CurveEarly DiagnosisFemaleFluorescein AngiographyGlaucoma, Open-AngleGonioscopyHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal VesselsROC CurveGanglion cell complexMacular vessel densityOptical coherence tomography angiographyPre-perimetric glaucomaPrimary open-angle glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID31914956
PMCPMC6950925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.