ArticleBMC family practice2020
Variables associated with interprofessional collaboration: a comparison between primary healthcare and specialized mental health teams.
Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collaborative Practices in Mental Health Care: A Concept Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Professionals' and Families' Perspectives on Essential Elements of Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis on Families with Multiple and Enduring Problems in Integrated Youth Care.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025Article
- Values and practice of collaboration in a mental health care system in the Netherlands: a qualitative study.International journal of mental health systems · 2023Article
- Interprofessional collaboration in the breast cancer unit: how do healthcare workers see it?BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Orthopedist involvement in the management of clinical activities: a case study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Healthcare professionals' perceptions about interprofessional teamwork: a national survey within Swedish child healthcare services.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Infection prevention and control during COVID-19 pandemic: realities from health care workers in a north central state in Nigeria.Epidemiology and infection · 2021Article
- REALITIES OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN NIGERIA: COPING WITH THE CHALLENGES AND CHARTING A WAY FORWARD.Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine · 2020Article
- From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings.International journal of integrated careArticle
- Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration Model-Questionnaire (PINCOM-Q).International journal of integrated careArticle
- "Interprofessional Collaboration" among Pharmacists, Physicians, and Nurses: A Hybrid Concept Analysis.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study has two aims: first, to identify variables associated with interprofessional collaboration (IPC) among a total of 315 Quebec mental health (MH) professionals working in MH primary care teams (PCTs, N = 101) or in specialized service teams (SSTs, N = 214); and second, to compare IPC associated variables in MH-PCTs vs MH-SSTs.
methodsA large number of variables acknowledged as strongly related to IPC in the literature were tested. Multivariate regression models were performed on MH-PCTs and MH-SSTs respectively.
resultsResults showed that knowledge integration, team climate and multifocal identification were independently and positively associated with IPC in both MH-PCTs and MH-SSTs. By contrast, knowledge sharing was positively associated with IPC in MH-PCTs only, and organizational support positively associated with IPC in MH-SSTs. Finally, one variable (age) was significantly and negatively associated with IPC in SSTs.
conclusionsImproving IPC and making MH teams more successful require the development and implementation of differentiated professional skills in MH-PCTs and MH-SSTs by care managers depending upon the level of care required (primary or specialized). Training is also needed for the promotion of interdisciplinary values and improvement of interprofessional knowledge regarding IPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.