Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31914722›Full record

ReviewClinical endoscopy2020

Methods that Assist Traction during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Literature Review.

Georgios Tziatzios, Alanna Ebigbo, Stefan Karl Gölder, Andreas Probst, Helmut Messmann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: Current Standard Indication and Management.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. [Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection assisted by metal-clip pocket creation traction for colorectal tumors].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2023
    Article
  11. Novel articulating through-the-scope traction device.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Georgios TziatziosDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Alanna EbigboDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Stefan Karl GölderDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Andreas ProbstDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Helmut MessmannDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
University Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established method for the treatment of early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms. Adequate submucosal exposure is one of the most significant factors related to an effective and safe dissection. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effcacy and safety of various methods that assist traction during ESD of precancerous and earlystage neoplastic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. We performed an electronic search of the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases for relevant studies published up to May 2019. Trials exclusively recruiting patients undergoing ESD for superficial gastrointestinal cancer were considered eligible for inclusion. Thirty-three articles including 3,134 patients met the inclusion criteria. The studies evaluated different approaches for widening the endoscopic view, including magnetic anchor-guided ESD (3 studies), use of a second endoscope (5 studies), clip-involving technique (21 studies), and miscellaneous methods (4 studies). Among them, only 6 were randomized controlled trials evaluating different approaches. Overall, the implementation of methods that assist traction during ESD significantly improved the operating time and R0 resection rate and decreased the rate of complications (bleeding and perforation). Interventions that assist traction seem effcacious in improving tissue traction, thus facilitating ESD performance.

Indexed as

DissectionEndoscopicMethodSubmucosalTraction

Identifiers

PMID31914722
PMCPMC7280854
OpenAlexW3000355089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.