Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31914596›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2020

DNA sequence repeats identify numerous Type I restriction-modification systems that are potential epigenetic regulators controlling phase-variable regulons; phasevarions.

John M Atack, Chengying Guo, Long Yang, Yaoqi Zhou, Michael P Jennings

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ThemBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Phase variation inEngineering microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. How to Unmask an Unknown: The Restriction-Modification SystemInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. BlihIA-A Novel Type I Restriction-Modification System fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phasevarions inMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Characterization of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Impacts ofMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John M AtackInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Chengying GuoCollege of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian City, China.
Long YangCollege of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian City, China.
Yaoqi ZhouInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Michael P JenningsInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Griffith University · AUShandong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over recent years several examples of randomly switching methyltransferases, associated with Type III restriction-modification (R-M) systems, have been described in pathogenic bacteria. In every case examined, changes in simple DNA sequence repeats result in variable methyltransferase expression and result in global changes in gene expression, and differentiation of the bacterial cell into distinct phenotypes. These epigenetic regulatory systems are called phasevarions, phase-variable regulons, and are widespread in bacteria, with 17.4% of Type III R-M system containing simple DNA sequence repeats. A distinct, recombination-driven random switching system has also been described in Streptococci in Type I R-M systems that also regulate gene expression. Here, we interrogate the most extensive and well-curated database of R-M systems, REBASE, by searching for all possible simple DNA sequence repeats in the hsdRMS genes that encode Type I R-M systems. We report that 7.9% of hsdS, 2% of hsdM, and of 4.3% of hsdR genes contain simple sequence repeats that are capable of mediating phase variation. Phase variation of both hsdM and hsdS genes will lead to differential methyltransferase expression or specificity, and thereby the potential to control phasevarions. These data suggest that in addition to well characterized phasevarions controlled by Type III mod genes, and the previously described Streptococcal Type I R-M systems that switch via recombination, approximately 10% of all Type I R-M systems surveyed herein have independently evolved the ability to randomly switch expression via simple DNA sequence repeats.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticMicrosatellite RepeatsRegulonBacterial ProteinsComputational BiologyDeoxyribonucleases, Type I Site-SpecificDNADNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Restriction-Modification EnzymesFusobacterium nucleatumGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMannheimia haemolyticaMethyltransferasesPhenotypeBacterial ProteinsDeoxyribonucleases, Type I Site-SpecificDNADNA Modification MethylasesDNA Restriction-Modification EnzymesHsdM protein, BacteriaHSDS protein, BacteriaMethyltransferasesbacterial pathogenesisepigeneticsphase variationphasevarionR‐M systems

Identifiers

PMID31914596
PMCPMC7383803
OpenAlexW2990402582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.