Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2020
Health Care Hotspotting - A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 161 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Health Care Hotspotting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Evaluation of Enhanced Care Management With Community Supports, Transitional Care, and Residential Care Coordination for High-Risk Medi-Cal Members Under CalAIM in California
Who cites it
161 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 309 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple imputation in clinical trials - what difference does it make? A systematic review of the impact of multiple imputation on treatment effect estimation.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Community Health Workers on 30-Day Hospital Readmission: A Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Collecting and using social needs data in health settings: a systematic review of the literature on health service utilization and costs.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Community care navigation intervention for people who are at risk of unplanned hospital presentations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Mortality and Hospital Readmissions Among Patients Receiving Virtual Ward Transitional Care vs Usual Postdischarge Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Discharge planning from hospital.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Community health worker interventions for older adults with complex health needs: A systematic review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Pooled it
- Screening and Referral for Social Needs Among Veterans: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Trial
- Care Coordination for High-Need, High-Cost Commercially Insured Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Perceptions of Medically Complex Patients Enrolled in an Ambulatory Intensive Care Unit at a Healthcare-for-the-Homeless Clinic.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Trial
- Impact of Referring High-Risk Patients to Intensive Outpatient Primary Care Services: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Trial
- Greater Covid-19 vaccine uptake among enrollees offered health and social needs case management: Results from a randomized trial.Health services research · 2024Trial
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effects of a Social Needs Navigation Intervention on Health Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization among Medicaid Members with Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Trial
- A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of nurse-led triage of 911 calls.Nature human behaviour · 2024Trial
- The Camden Coalition Care Management Program Improved Intermediate Care Coordination: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2024Trial
- Ambulatory Intensive Care for Medically Complex Patients at a Health Care Clinic for Individuals Experiencing Homelessness: The SUMMIT Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Hospital Readmissions by Variation in Engagement in the Health Care Hotspotting Trial: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Pragmatic Clinical Trial to Improve Patient Experience Among Adults During Transitions from Hospital to Home: the PArTNER study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Trial
- Social risks and social needs in a health insurance exchange sample: a longitudinal evaluation of utilization.BMC health services research · 2022Trial
- Acute Care Utilization After Recovery Coaching Linkage During Substance-Related Inpatient Admission: Results of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Trial
101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is widespread interest in programs aiming to reduce spending and improve health care quality among "superutilizers," patients with very high use of health care services. The "hotspotting" program created by the Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers (hereafter, the Coalition) has received national attention as a promising superutilizer intervention and has been expanded to cities around the country. In the months after hospital discharge, a team of nurses, social workers, and community health workers visits enrolled patients to coordinate outpatient care and link them with social services.
methodsWe randomly assigned 800 hospitalized patients with medically and socially complex conditions, all with at least one additional hospitalization in the preceding 6 months, to the Coalition's care-transition program or to usual care. The primary outcome was hospital readmission within 180 days after discharge.
resultsThe 180-day readmission rate was 62.3% in the intervention group and 61.7% in the control group. The adjusted between-group difference was not significant (0.82 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -5.97 to 7.61). In contrast, a comparison of the intervention-group admissions during the 6 months before and after enrollment misleadingly suggested a 38-percentage-point decline in admissions related to the intervention because the comparison did not account for the similar decline in the control group.
conclusionsIn this randomized, controlled trial involving patients with very high use of health care services, readmission rates were not lower among patients randomly assigned to the Coalition's program than among those who received usual care. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02090426; American Economic Association registry number, AEARCTR-0000329.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.