SynthesisMedicine2020
Association between changes in QRS width and echocardiographic responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- QRS Index as a Predictor of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Maximizing QRS duration reduction in contemporary cardiac resynchronization therapy is feasible and shorter QRS duration is associated with better clinical outcome.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023Article
- Conduction Disorders: The Value of Surface ECG.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous studies have illustrated the association of QRS width with the incidence of echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to summarize the observational studies regarding the magnitude of change in QRS width between responders and nonresponders to CRT.
methodsThe PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies investigating the changes of QRS width with the incidence of echocardiographic response to CRT from inception till May 2019. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated through random-effects model.
resultsFive prospective and 6 retrospective studies with a total of 1524 patients were selected for final analysis. The reduction of QRS width in responders was significantly greater than nonresponders (WMD: -20.54 ms; 95% CI: -26.78 to -14.29; P < .001). Moreover, responders were associated with greater percentage reduction in QRS width when compared with nonresponders (WMD: -8.80%; 95% CI: -13.08 to -4.52; P < .001). Finally, the mean change in QRS width between responders and nonresponders differed when stratified by country, study design, mean age, percentage male, ejection fraction, measuring time of postimplanted QRS, ischemic cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and study quality.
conclusionsThese findings indicated that shortening QRS width after CRT device implantation showed association with greater incidence of echocardiographic responses to CRT. Further prospective studies should be conducted to evaluate the prognostic values of QRS width on the incidence of echocardiographic response to CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.