Observational studyMedicine2020
Effectiveness of percutaneous cement injection on proximal junctional failure after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Preliminary study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Extended Follow-up of Spinal Instrumentation Rescue with Cement Augmentation.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Lateral access minimally invasive spine surgery in adult spinal deformity.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review.Brain & spine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proximal junctional failure (PJF) is the greatest challenge after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous cement injection (PCI) for PJF after PLIF patients requiring surgical revision.In this retrospective clinical study, we reviewed 7 patients requiring surgical revision for PJF after PLIF with 18 months follow-up. They received PCI at the collapsed vertebral body and supra-adjacent vertebra, with or without intervertebral disc intervention. The outcome measures were radiographic findings and revision surgery. Two different radiographic parameters (wedging rate (%) of the fractured vertebral body and local kyphosis angle) were used, and were performed before and immediately after PCI, and 18 month after the PCI.In our study, we showed that 5 of 7 patients who experienced PJF after PLIF did not receive any revision surgery after PCI. Immediately after cement injection, the anterior wedging rate (%) and the local kyphosis angle were significantly improved (P = .018, P = .028). The anterior wedging rates (%) and local kyphosis angle, at pre-PCI, immediate after PCI, and at final follow-up, were not significantly different between the non-revision surgery and revision surgery groups.Five of 7 patients who experienced PJF after PLIF did not receive revision surgery after PCI. Considering that general anesthesia and open surgery are high-risk procedures for geriatric patients, our results suggest that non-surgical PCI could be a viable alternative treatment option for PJF.SMC2017-01-011-001. Retrospectively registered 18 January 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.