SynthesisMedicine2020
Long-term efficacy after closure of patent foramen ovale for ischemic neurological events in young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: endeavoring for clarity.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Transesophageal echocardiography-guided percutaneous closure of the patent foramen ovale only uses the sheath.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2023Article
- Effect of atrial septal dilation tumor and patent foramen rotundus on cryptogenic ischemic stroke in young and middle-aged patients.African health sciences · 2022Article
- Patent foramen ovale closure in non-lacunar cryptogenic ischemic stroke: where are we now?Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure remains controversial, and it is unclear which patient groups are best benefited. We performed this meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy of PFO closure of younger patients for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events.
methodsWe systematically searched for studies of PFO closure for younger patients under the age of 55, and pooled available data on PFO closure of younger vs older patients and on PFO closure of younger patients vs medical therapy. The primary endpoints were the composite outcome of recurrent ischemic neurological events [stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA)]. The secondary endpoints included recurrent stroke, TIA, atrial fibrillation (AF) and bleeding events. We calculated the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using fixed-effect and random-effect models.
resultsThree randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 13 observational studies were eligible. Compared with older patients undergoing PFO closure, younger patients undergoing closure had a lower risk of composite outcome (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28 to .56; P < .001) and AF (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.10-0.61; P = .003). Compared with medical therapy, PFO closure of younger patients reduced the risk of composite outcome (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.75; P<.001); there was no statistical difference in total complications of AF and bleeding events (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 0.15-30.37; P = .57). Separate analysis of stroke and TIA showed that PFO closure in younger patients was more effective in preventing stroke (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28-0.72; P < .001) and TIA (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.21-0.58); P < .001) compared with older patients. Compared with medical therapy, PFO closure of younger patients reduced the risk of stroke (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.51; P < .001); but there was no difference in the risk of TIA (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.16-7.01; P = .94).
conclusionsCompared with PFO closure of older patients and medical therapy, PFO closure of younger patients can benefit more for the prevention of recurrent ischemic neurological events. Our results indicate that PFO closure is the best treatment strategy for younger patients under the age of 55.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.