Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31914043›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Inequality in the health services utilization in rural and urban china: A horizontal inequality analysis.

Bin Guo, Xin Xie, Qunhong Wu, Xin Zhang, Huaizhi Cheng, Sihai Tao, Hude Quan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Educational Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Rural Populations: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bin GuoDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin.
Xin XieQuality Control Department of Yibin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yibin, Sichuan.
Qunhong WuDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin.
Huaizhi ChengDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Medical University (Daqing), Daqing, Heilongjiang.
Sihai TaoDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin.
Hude QuanDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInequality in health and health care remains a rather challenging issue in China, existing both in rural and urban area, and between rural and urban. This study used nationally representative data to assess inequality in both rural and urban China separately and to identify socioeconomic factors that may contribute to this inequality.

methodsThis study used 2008 National Health Services Survey data. Demographic characteristics, income, health status, medical service utilization, and medical expenses were collected. Horizontal inequality analysis was performed using nonlinear regression method.

resultsPositive inequity in outpatient services and inpatient service was evident in both rural and urban area of China. Greater inequity of outpatient service use in urban than that in rural areas was evident (horizontal inequity index [HI] = 0.085 vs 0.029). In contrast, rural areas had greater inequity of inpatient service use compared to urban areas (HI = 0.21 vs 0.16). The decomposition analysis found that the household income made the greatest pro-rich contribution in both rural and urban China. However, chronic diseases and aging were also important contributors to the inequality in rural area.

conclusionThe inequality in health service in both rural and urban China was mainly attributed to the household income. In addition, chronic disease and aging were associated with inequality in rural population. Those findings provide evidences for policymaker to develop a sustainable social welfare system in China.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChinaFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth ExpendituresHealth StatusHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRural Population

Identifiers

PMID31914043
PMCPMC6959938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.