SynthesisMedicine2020
Ginkgol Biloba extract as an adjunctive treatment for ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic-search-and-review of registered pharmacological therapies investigated to improve neuro-recovery after a stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- The therapeutic effects of various tonic traditional Chinese medicines on demyelinating diseases.Metabolic brain disease · 2025Review
- Medication stewardship by clinical pharmacists in acute ischemic stroke care: a retrospective analysis of drug-related problem reduction and cost-saving outcomes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Analysis of online prescription patterns in Chinese patients with sequelae of cerebral infarction: a real-world study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- Potent Inhibition of Human Cytochrome P450 3A4 by Biflavone Components from Ginkgo Biloba and Selaginella Tamariscina.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Cytotoxic effect ofHeliyon · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGinkgo biloba extract (GBE) is widely used as an adjunctive treatment for ischemic stroke. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of GBE specifically for long-term users at the convalescence stage of ischemic stroke.
methodsMEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase Database, WHO Clinical Trials Registration Platform, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database were searched from inception to 20 September 2018. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect estimates using RevMan software (5.3; Review Manager [RevMan], Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). A meta-analysis was performed where data were available. A trial sequential analysis was used to control random errors for recurrence rate and the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations) approach was used to assess the quality of the body of evidence. The meta-analysis design was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018110211, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).
resultsWe identified 15 randomized clinical trials involving 1829 participants. The majority of the included trials were of high risk of bias in methodological quality. For acute ischemic stroke, adding GBE to conventional therapy led to higher Barthel index scores (MD: 5.72; 95% CI: 3.11-8.33) and lower neurological function deficit scores (MD: -1.39; 95% CI: -2.15 to -0.62). For patients in their convalescence (or sequelae) stage of ischemic stroke, GBE was superior in improving dependence (MD: 7.17; 95% CI: 5.96-8.38) and neurological function deficit scores (MD: -1.15; 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.53) compared with placebo or conventional therapy, but there was no difference in vascular events (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.44-1.14), recurrence rate (RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.26-1.25; trial sequential analysis: conclusive) and mortality (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.41-2.81).
conclusionsGBE appears to improve neurological function and dependence compared with conventional therapy for ischemic stroke at different stages and appears generally safe for clinical application. The lack of improvement in recurrence rate was confirmed by trial sequential analysis. Due to the generally weak evidence, further large, rigorous trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.