Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31913497›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2020

A major locus controls a biologically active pheromone component in Heliconius melpomene.

Kelsey J R P Byers, Kathy Darragh, Jamie Musgrove, Diana Abondano Almeida, Sylvia Fernanda Garza, Ian A Warren, Pasi M Rastas, Marek Kučka, Yingguang Frank Chan, Richard M Merrill and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Kelsey J R P ByersDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0923-8264
Kathy DarraghDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9215-014X
Jamie MusgroveSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Panama.
Diana Abondano AlmeidaSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Panama.
Sylvia Fernanda GarzaSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Panama.
Ian A WarrenDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom.
Pasi M RastasInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Marek KučkaFriedrich Miescher Laboratory, Max Planck Society, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Yingguang Frank ChanFriedrich Miescher Laboratory, Max Planck Society, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Richard M MerrillDivision of Evolutionary Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80539, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4527-9298
Stefan SchulzDepartment of Life Sciences, Institute of Organic Chemistry, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany.
W Owen McMillanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Panama.
Chris D JigginsDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7809-062X
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAMax Planck Society · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETechnische Universität Braunschweig · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG Schu984/13-1European Research CouncilMax-Planck-GesellschaftNatural Environment Research Council Doctoral Training PartnershipSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the production, response, and genetics of signals used in mate choice can inform our understanding of the evolution of both intraspecific mate choice and reproductive isolation. Sex pheromones are important for courtship and mate choice in many insects, but we know relatively little of their role in butterflies. The butterfly Heliconius melpomene uses a complex blend of wing androconial compounds during courtship. Electroantennography in H. melpomene and its close relative Heliconius cydno showed that responses to androconial extracts were not species specific. Females of both species responded equally strongly to extracts of both species, suggesting conservation of peripheral nervous system elements across the two species. Individual blend components provoked little to no response, with the exception of octadecanal, a major component of the H. melpomene blend. Supplementing octadecanal on the wings of octadecanal-rich H. melpomene males led to an increase in the time until mating, demonstrating the bioactivity of octadecanal in Heliconius. Using quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, we identified a single locus on chromosome 20 responsible for 41% of the parental species' difference in octadecanal production. This QTL does not overlap with any of the major wing color or mate choice loci, nor does it overlap with known regions of elevated or reduced F

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociAnimalsButterfliesChromosome MappingFemaleMaleSex AttractantsSex AttractantsBehaviorelectroantennographyHeliconiuspheromonesquantitative trait locus mapping

Identifiers

PMID31913497
PMCPMC7027519
OpenAlexW2999744214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.