Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31913119›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Resolving multisensory and attentional influences across cortical depth in sensory cortices.

Remi Gau, Pierre-Louis Bazin, Robert Trampel, Robert Turner, Uta Noppeney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neuronal Modeling of Cross-Sensory Visual Evoked Magnetoencephalography Responses in the Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Visual Stimuli Modulate Local Field Potentials But Drive No High-Frequency Activity in Human Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Remi GauComputational Neuroscience and Cognitive Robotics Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-9767
Pierre-Louis BazinMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0141-5510
Robert TrampelMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Robert TurnerMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Uta NoppeneyComputational Neuroscience and Cognitive Robotics Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEOxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

European Research Council Mult-sens
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our environment, our senses are bombarded with a myriad of signals, only a subset of which is relevant for our goals. Using sub-millimeter-resolution fMRI at 7T, we resolved BOLD-response and activation patterns across cortical depth in early sensory cortices to auditory, visual and audiovisual stimuli under auditory or visual attention. In visual cortices, auditory stimulation induced widespread inhibition irrespective of attention, whereas auditory relative to visual attention suppressed mainly central visual field representations. In auditory cortices, visual stimulation suppressed activations, but amplified responses to concurrent auditory stimuli, in a patchy topography. Critically, multisensory interactions in auditory cortices were stronger in deeper laminae, while attentional influences were greatest at the surface. These distinct depth-dependent profiles suggest that multisensory and attentional mechanisms regulate sensory processing via partly distinct circuitries. Our findings are crucial for understanding how the brain regulates information flow across senses to interact with our complex multisensory world.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAttentionAuditory CortexBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual FieldsYoung Adultaudiovisualcortical layerscrossmodal attentiondeactivations,humanmultisensory integrationneuroscienceprimary sensory cortices

Identifiers

PMID31913119
PMCPMC6984812
OpenAlexW3000614361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.