Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31912954›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2020

The effect of climate change on the resilience of ecosystems with adaptive spatial pattern formation.

Robbin Bastiaansen, Arjen Doelman, Maarten B Eppinga, Max Rietkerk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution shapes ecosystem resilience through spatial self-organization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Early Warning Signals in Ecological Time-Series.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. How spatial patterns can lead to less resilient ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Causes and consequences of disordered hyperuniformity in global drylands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. How spatiotemporal dynamics can enhance ecosystem resilience.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The hidden order of Turing patterns in arid and semi-arid vegetation ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Fairy circle tales.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Phase-separation physics underlies new theory for the resilience of patchy ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robbin BastiaansenMathematical Institute, Leiden University, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-8360
Arjen DoelmanMathematical Institute, Leiden University, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maarten B EppingaDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Max RietkerkDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 657.014.002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a rapidly changing world, quantifying ecosystem resilience is an important challenge. Historically, resilience has been defined via models that do not take spatial effects into account. These systems can only adapt via uniform adjustments. In reality, however, the response is not necessarily uniform, and can lead to the formation of (self-organised) spatial patterns - typically localised vegetation patches. Classical measures of resilience cannot capture the emerging dynamics in spatially self-organised systems, including transitions between patterned states that have limited impact on ecosystem structure and productivity. We present a framework of interlinked phase portraits that appropriately quantifies the resilience of patterned states, which depends on the number of patches, the distances between them and environmental conditions. We show how classical resilience concepts fail to distinguish between small and large pattern transitions, and find that the variance in interpatch distances provides a suitable indicator for the type of imminent transition. Subsequently, we describe the dependency of ecosystem degradation based on the rate of climatic change: slow change leads to sporadic, large transitions, whereas fast change causes a rapid sequence of smaller transitions. Finally, we discuss how pre-emptive removal of patches can minimise productivity losses during pattern transitions, constituting a viable conservation strategy.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemadaptability of patternscritical transitionsdesertificationecosystem resilienceregime shiftsself-organisationspatial ecologyspatial patterns

Identifiers

PMID31912954
PMCPMC7028049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.