ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2020
Sensitizing endometrial cancer to ionizing radiation by multi-tyrosine kinase inhibition.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systems biology-driven identification of biomarkers and significant pathways in radiation-induced hormone-sensitive cancers.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- MLLT11-TRIL complex promotes the progression of endometrial cancer through PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.Cancer biology & therapy · 2022Article
- Glucose transporters: Important regulators of endometrial cancer therapy sensitivity.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Review
- NLRC5 promotes cell migration and invasion by activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in endometrial cancer.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEndometrial carcinoma is the most frequent gynecological cancer. About 15% of these cancers are of high risk and radiotherapy still remains the most suitable treatment. In this context, agents able to promote radiosensitization are of great interest. Here, we describe for the first time the radiosensitization ability of sunitinib in endometrial carcinoma.
methodsFour endometrial carcinoma cell lines were used for the study. The activation of apoptosis signalling pathways and tyrosine kinase receptors were analysed by Western blot, luciferase assays and Immunoprecipitation. Radiosensitization effects were assessed using clonogenic assays. p65 and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) were upregulated by lentiviral transduction.
resultsWe discovered that ionizing radiation activates the pro-oncogenic proteins and signalling pathways KIT, protein kinase B (AKT), and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and these activations were abrogated by sunitinib, resulting in a radiosensitization effect. We found out that AKT pathway is greatly involved in this process as PTEN restoration in the PTEN-deficient cell line RL95-2 is sufficient to inhibit AKT, rendering these cells more susceptible to ionizing radiation and sunitinib-induced radiosensitization. In Ishikawa 3-H-12 cells, radiosensitization effects and inhibition of AKT were achieved by PTEN restoration plus treatment with the phosphoinositide-3-kinase inhibitor LY294002. This suggests that endometrial tumors could have different sensitivity degree to radiotherapy and susceptibility to sunitinib-induced radiosensitization depending on their AKT activation levels.
conclusionsOur results provide the rationale of using sunitinib as neoadjuvant treatment prior radiotherapy which could be a starting point for the implementation of sunitinib and radiotherapy in the clinic for the treatment of recalcitrant endometrial cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.