Trial reportEpilepsia2020
Open-label study to investigate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel in pediatric patients (4 to <12 years) with inadequately controlled focal seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures.
Trial report in Epilepsia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02849626 (An Open-Label, Multicenter Study With an Extension Phase to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Exposure-Efficacy Relationship of Perampanel Oral Suspension When Administered as an Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study With an Extension Phase to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Exposure-Efficacy Relationship of Perampanel Oral Suspension When Administered as an Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric Subjects (Age 4 to Less Than 12 Years) With Inadequately Controlled Partial-Onset Seizures or Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Movement Disorders Secondary to Novel Antiseizure Medications in Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Risk.Journal of child neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Exploring the Evidence for Broad-Spectrum Effectiveness of Perampanel: A Systematic Review of Clinical Data in Generalised Seizures.CNS drugs · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of perampanel in patients with seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A randomized trial.Epilepsia · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Perampanel in Young Children (7-46 Months) With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Real-World Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Modulation of glutamate metabolism in Niemann-pick disease type C1 mice.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Perampanel in Refractory Focal Epilepsy: Real-World Evidence From a Chinese Cohort.Brain and behavior · 2025Observational
- Effectiveness and safety of perampanel for pediatric patients with epilepsy: A real-world study from China.Pediatric investigation · 2025Article
- Clinical factors associated with perampanel retention, response, seizure freedom and tolerability: real-world evidence from the PERMIT Extension study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel treatment in pediatric patients with epilepsy aged 4-12 years: a real-world study.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Effectiveness and safety of mono- and add-on perampanel in pediatric patients with epilepsy: Experience from a single-center retrospective study.Epilepsia open · 2024Observational
- Pathophysiology to Risk Factor and Therapeutics to Treatment Strategies on Epilepsy.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- The Cognitive and Behavioural Effects of Perampanel in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in pediatric patients aged 4-19 years with epilepsy: a real-world study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Efficacy of perampanel in pediatric epilepsy with known and presumed genetic etiology.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Kainate Receptor Antagonists: Recent Advances and Therapeutic Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Efficacy and safety of perampanel as early add-on therapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Perampanel outcomes at different stages of treatment in people with focal and generalized epilepsy treated in clinical practice: Evidence from the PERMIT study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- The broad-spectrum activity of perampanel: state of the art and future perspective of AMPA antagonism beyond epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of perampanel and oxcarbazepine as monotherapy in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveStudy 311 (NCT02849626) was a global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study that assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of once-daily adjunctive perampanel oral suspension in pediatric patients (aged 4 to <12 years) with focal seizures (FS) (with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures [FBTCS]) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS).
methodsIn the 311 Core Study, a 4-week Pre-treatment Period (Screening/Baseline) preceded a 23-week Treatment Period (11-week Titration; 12-week Maintenance) and 4-week Follow-up. Endpoints included safety/tolerability (primary endpoint), median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days from Baseline (Treatment Period), and 50% responder and seizure-freedom rates (Maintenance Period). Patients were stratified by age (4 to <7; 7 to <12 years) and concomitant enzyme-inducing anti-seizure drug (EIASD) use.
resultsOne hundred eighty patients were enrolled (FS, n = 149; FBTCS, n = 54; GTCS, n = 31). The Core Study was completed by 146 patients (81%); the most common primary reason for discontinuation was adverse event (AE) (n = 14 [8%]). Mean (standard deviation) daily perampanel dose was 7.0 (2.6) mg/day and median (interquartile range) duration of exposure was 22.9 (2.0) weeks. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs; 89%) was similar between patients with FS (with/without FBTCS) and GTCS. The most common TEAEs were somnolence (26%) and nasopharyngitis (19%). There were no clinically important changes observed for cognitive function, laboratory, or electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters or vital signs. Median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days from Baseline were as follows: 40% (FS), 59% (FBTCS), and 69% (GTCS). Corresponding 50% responder and seizure-freedom rates were as follows: FS, 47% and 12%; FBTCS, 65% and 19%; and GTCS, 64% and 55%, respectively. Improvements in response/seizure frequency from Baseline were seen regardless of age or concomitant EIASD use. SIGNIFICANCE: Results from the 311 Core Study suggest that daily oral doses of adjunctive perampanel are generally safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in children age 4 to <12 years with FS (with/without FBTCS) or GTCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.