ArticleInternational journal of hematology2020
Favourable survival in "Discordant" acute gastrointestinal graft versus host disease (GI-GVHD) is explained by mild clinical course and treatment-responsive disease.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overexpression of S100A9 in donor T cells is associated with reconstitution of gut microbiota and outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Blood research · 2023Article
- Impact of the histologic grade of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease on outcomes in pediatric patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have previously reported that haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation recipients with biopsy-negative acute Gastrointestinal Graft versus Host Disease (Discordant GVHD) demonstrate superior survival compared to "True Positive" cases. We aimed to elucidate this discrepancy by examining clinical and laboratory predictors of survival among patients treated for True Positive or Discordant GVHD. Data were obtained by retrospective chart review. At diagnosis, the incidence of severe symptoms, hypoalbuminaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, and poor performance status were recorded. Following treatment, the incidence of non-response to first-line corticosteroids was assessed. Differences between cohorts were compared using Fisher's exact test. 74 patients were identified, comprising 55 (74%) True Positive and 19 (26%) Discordant GVHD cases. True Positive cases were significantly more likely to have baseline severe symptoms (84% vs. 36%; p = 0.0002) and hypoalbuminaemia (94% vs. 75%; p = 0.023). There was no significant difference between cohorts in terms of hyperbilirubinaemia or performance status. Non-response to corticosteroid therapy was observed significantly more frequently in the True Positive cohort (55% vs. 11%; p = 0.001). In summary, the superior survival observed in Discordant GVHD is explained by a less severe GI-GVHD phenotype at diagnosis and a greater likelihood of response to corticosteroids. Further research is warranted to explain biological mechanisms for these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.