Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31912341›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2020

Effect of Application of Probiotic Pollen Suspension on Immune Response and Gut Microbiota of Honey Bees (Apis mellifera).

Ivana Cingeľová Maruščáková, Petra Schusterová, Bohumil Bielik, Juraj Toporčák, Katarína Bíliková, Dagmar Mudroňová

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Isolation and characterization ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Intestinal Immune Defense System in Insects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivana Cingeľová MaruščákováDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 041 81, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Petra SchusterováDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 041 81, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Bohumil BielikClinic of birds, exotic and free living animals, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 041 81, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Juraj ToporčákClinic of birds, exotic and free living animals, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 041 81, Košice, Slovak Republic.
Katarína BílikováDepartment of Molecular Apidology, Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 21, 845 51, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Dagmar MudroňováDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 041 81, Košice, Slovak Republic. dagmar.mudronova@uvlf.sk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8007-6237
University of Veterinary Medicine in Košice · SKSlovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the use of probiotic bacteria in invertebrates is still rare, scientists have begun to look into their usage in honey bees. The probiotic preparation, based on the autochthonous strain Lactobacillus brevis B50 Biocenol™ (CCM 8618), which was isolated from the digestive tracts of healthy bees, was applied to the bee colonies in the form of a pollen suspension. Its influence on the immune response was determined by monitoring the expression of genes encoding immunologically important molecules in the honey bee intestines. Changes in the intestinal microbiota composition were also studied. The results showed that the probiotic Lact. brevis B50, on a pollen carrier, significantly increased the expression of genes encoding antimicrobial peptides (abaecin, defensin-1) as well as pattern recognition receptors (toll-like receptor, peptidoglycan recognition proteins). Gene expression for the other tested molecules included in Toll and Imd signaling pathways (dorsal, cactus, kenny, relish) significantly changed during the experiment. The positive effect on intestinal microbiota was manifested mainly by a significant increase in the ratio of lactic acid bacteria to enterobacteria. These findings confirm the potential of the tested probiotic preparation to enhance immunity in bee colonies and thus increase their resistance to infectious diseases and stress conditions.

Indexed as

BeesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunityPollenAnimalsGene ExpressionProbioticsHoney bee intestineImmune signaling pathwaysIntestinal bacteriaProbiotic lactobacilli

Identifiers

PMID31912341
OpenAlexW3000247511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.