Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31912333›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2021

Comparison between VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation techniques for early facial nerve reanimation after surgical intra-cranial injuries: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the functional outcomes.

Luca Ricciardi, Vito Stifano, Resi Pucci, Vittorio Stumpo, Nicola Montano, Marco Della Monaca, Liverana Lauretti, Alessandro Olivi, Valentino Valentini, Carmelo Lucio Sturiale

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luca Ricciardi *Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. ricciardi.lu@gmail.com.
Vito Stifano *Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Resi PucciInstitute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Vittorio StumpoInstitute of Neurosurgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Nicola MontanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Marco Della MonacaDipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche e Chirurgia Maxillo-Facciale, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Liverana LaurettiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro OliviDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Valentino ValentiniDipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche e Chirurgia Maxillo-Facciale, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Carmelo Lucio SturialeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical injury of the intracranial portion of the facial nerve (FN) is a severe complication of many skull base procedures, and it represents a relevant issue in terms of patients' discomfort, social interactions, risk for depression, and social costs. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical and functional outcomes of the most common facial nerve rehabilitation techniques. The present study is a systematic review of the pertinent literature, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two different online medical databases (PubMed, Scopus) were screened for studies reporting the functional outcome, measured by the House-Brackman (HB) scale, and complications, in FN early reanimation, following surgical injuries on its intracranial portion. Data on the VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation, the surgical technique, the use of a nerve graft, the duration of the deficit, and complications were collected and pooled. The XII-to-VII end-to-side coaptation seems to provide higher chances for functional restoration (HB 1-3) than the VII-to-VII (68.8% vs 60.6%), regardless of the duration of the palsy deficit, the use or not of a nerve graft, and the use of stitches or glues. However, its complication rate was as high as 28.6%, and a second procedure is then often needed. The XII-to-VII side-to-end coaptation is the most effective in providing a functional outcome (HB 1-3), even though it is associated to a higher complication rate. Further trials are needed to better investigate this relevant topic, in terms of health-related social costs and patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

Facial NerveFacial Nerve InjuriesFacial ParalysisHumansHypoglossal NerveNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsSkull BaseTreatment OutcomeAcoustic neuromaFacial nerveFacial reanimationMicrosurgeryPeripheral nerveSkull base

Identifiers

PMID31912333
OpenAlexW3000480040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.